Modeling of permeability and compaction characteristics of soils using evolutionary polynomial regression

This paper presents a new approach, based on evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR), for prediction of permeability (K), maximum dry density (MDD), and optimum moisture content (OMC) as functions of some physical properties of soil. EPR is a data-driven method based on evolutionary computing aimed to search for polynomial structures representing a system. In this technique, a combination of the genetic algorithm (GA) and the least-squares method is used to find feasible structures and the appropriate parameters of those structures. EPR models are developed based on results from a series of classification, compaction, and permeability tests from the literature. The tests included standard Proctor tests, constant head permeability tests, and falling head permeability tests conducted on soils made of four components, bentonite, limestone dust, sand, and gravel, mixed in different proportions. The results of the EPR model predictions are compared with those of a neural network model, a correlation equation from the literature, and the experimental data. Comparison of the results shows that the proposed models are highly accurate and robust in predicting permeability and compaction characteristics of soils. Results from sensitivity analysis indicate that the models trained from experimental data have been able to capture many physical relationships between soil parameters. The proposed models are also able to represent the degree to which individual contributing parameters affect the maximum dry density, optimum moisture content, and permeability.

[1]  James K. Mitchell,et al.  Permeability of Compacted Clay , 1965 .

[2]  S. Hannula,et al.  ASTM Special Technical Publication , 1986 .

[3]  M. C. Wang,et al.  Soil Compaction and Permeability Prediction Models , 1984 .

[4]  Victor L. Hauser Seepage Control by Particle Size Selection , 1978 .

[5]  A. R. Jumikis Geology of Soils of the Newark (N.J.) Metropolitan Area , 1958 .

[6]  Yacoub M. Najjar,et al.  On the identification of compaction characteristics by neuronets , 1996 .

[7]  Ajay Gupta,et al.  Influence of sand grading on the characteristics of mortars and soil–cement block masonry , 2008 .

[8]  Agr Bullen,et al.  PERMEABILITY AND RELATED PROPERTIES OF COAL REFUSE , 1977 .

[9]  G. Ring,et al.  CORRELATION OF COMPACTION AND CLASSIFICATION TEST DATA , 1962 .

[10]  Orazio Giustolisi,et al.  An evolutionary‐based data mining technique for assessment of civil engineering systems , 2008 .

[11]  T. Lambe Soil testing for engineers. , 1951 .

[12]  D. Savić,et al.  A symbolic data-driven technique based on evolutionary polynomial regression , 2006 .

[13]  Sunil K. Sinha,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Prediction Models for Soil Compaction and Permeability , 2008 .

[14]  Roy E. Olson,et al.  Effective Stress Theory of Soil Compaction , 1963 .

[15]  Asuri Sridharan,et al.  Plastic limit and compaction characteristics of fine- grained soils , 2005 .

[16]  Alan S. Michaels,et al.  Permeability of Kaolinite , 1954 .

[17]  W. E. Larson,et al.  A Model for Predicting Packing Density of Soils Using Particle-Size Distribution1 , 1979 .

[18]  Moshe Livneh,et al.  USING INDICATIVE PROPERTIES TO PREDICT THE DENSITY-MOISTURE RELATIONSHIP OF SOILS , 1978 .

[19]  Merlin E. Horn,et al.  Estimating Soil Permeability Rates , 1971 .

[20]  D. T. Davidson,et al.  CALCULATION OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT FROM MECHANICAL ANALYSIS, SHRINKAGE FACTORS, AND PLASTICITY INDEX , 1950 .

[21]  Craig H. Benson,et al.  Estimating Optimum Water Content and Maximum Dry Unit Weight for Compacted Clays , 2000 .

[22]  F. Zunker,et al.  Das Verhalten des Bodens zum Wasser , 1930 .

[23]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  Fundamentals of soil mechanics , 1948 .