Invertibility and transitivity analysis for nonrigid image registration

We present a new method for evaluating the perfor- mance of nonrigid image registration algorithms by analyzing the invertibility and transitivity properties of the transformations that they produce. The invertibility and transitivity of transformations com- puted using a unidirectional and a consistent linear-elastic registra- tion algorithm are evaluated. The invertibility of the transformations is evaluated by comparing the composition of transformations from images A to B and B to A to the identity mapping. The transitivity of the transformations is evaluated by measuring the difference be- tween the identity mapping and the composition of the transforma- tions from images A to B, Bt o C, and C to A. Transformations are generated by matching three computer-generated phantoms, three computed tomography (CT) data of infant heads, and 23 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of adult brains. In all cases, the in- verse consistency constraint (ICC) algorithm out-performs the unidi- rectional algorithm by producing transformations that have less in- verse consistency error and less transitivity error. For the MRI brain data, the ICC algorithm reduced the maximum inverse consistency error by 205 times, the average transitivity error by 50%, and the maximum transitivity error by 37% on average compared to the uni- directional algorithm. © 2003 SPIE and IS&T. (DOI: 10.1117/1.1526494)

[1]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Consistent Linear-Elastic Transformations for Image Matching , 1999, IPMI.

[2]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Voxel Similarity Measures for 3D Serial MR Brain Image Registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  M W Vannier,et al.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  G. Christensen,et al.  Hippocampal MR imaging morphometry by means of general pattern matching. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[6]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  U. Grenander,et al.  Statistical methods in computational anatomy , 1997, Statistical methods in medical research.

[8]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  ANIMAL+INSECT: Improved Cortical Structure Segmentation , 1999, IPMI.

[9]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[10]  Yali Amit,et al.  A Nonlinear Variational Problem for Image Matching , 1994, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[13]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  Karl Heinz Höhne,et al.  A volume-based anatomical atlas , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[15]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  Haim Levkowitz,et al.  Color scales for image data , 1992, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[18]  M I Miller,et al.  Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Voxel similarity measures for 3-D serial MR brain image registration , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Alex A. Kane,et al.  Synthesis of an individualized cranial atlas with dysmorphic shape , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[21]  U. Grenander,et al.  Structural Image Restoration through Deformable Templates , 1991 .

[22]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Accurate registration of serial 3D MR brain images and its application to visualizing change in neurodegenerative disorders. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Gaussian Random Fields on Sub-Manifolds for Characterizing Brain Surfaces , 1997, IPMI.

[25]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[26]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[28]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Detection, visualization and animation of abnormal anatomic structure with a deformable probabilistic brain atlas based on random vector field transformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial Normalization Nonlinear Spatial Normalization Using Basis Functions Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization Spatial Normalization 2.1 the Basic Optimization Algorithm 1 C a from This We Can Derive an , 1999 .

[30]  Christian Barillot,et al.  Bayesian approach to the brain image matching problem , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[31]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Synthesizing average 3D anatomical shapes using deformable templates , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[32]  G. Christensen Bayesian Framework for Image Registration Using Eigenfunctions , 1999 .

[33]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.

[34]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three-dimensional hippocampal MR morphometry with high-dimensional transformation of a neuroanatomic atlas. , 1997, Radiology.

[36]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Consistent image registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.