Constructivist and Constructionist Approaches to Graduate Teaching in Second Life: Ethical Considerations and Legal Implications

As a growing number of faculty use constructivist and constructionist approaches to teaching in SL, little research exists on the many ethical considerations and legal implications that affect course development. Following the experiences of the instructor and five students, their 12-week journey is documented through interviews, journals, blogs, weekly course activities, SL class dialogs, and in-world assignments. Additionally, five faculty and staff experts who taught or trained in SL at this university were also interviewed and consulted. Ethical considerations in constructivist and constructionist teaching were time, appearance, skills, scaffolded instruction, playful exploration, vicarious experience, self-directed project development, construction of objects, constructivism and constructionism balance, social networking and collaboration, harassment and griefing, false identities and alternate avatars, chat log sharing, and copyright and trademark violations. Lessons learned included developing scaffolded pedagogical approaches that moved from direct teaching to constructivism and constructionism, and required faculty and student adherence to the SL TOS, Community Standards, and Intellectual Property policy.

[1]  Michele D. Dickey.  Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical Affordances and Constraints of 3D Virtual Worlds for Synchronous Distance Learning , 2003 .

[2]  D. C. Phillips.  Constructivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues. Ninety-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. , 2000 .

[3]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  Competitive and Professional Gaming: Discussing Potential Benefits of Scientific Study , 2013, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[4]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[5]  David M. Antonacci,et al.  Envisioning the Educational Possibilities of User-Created Virtual Worlds. , 2008 .

[6]  Justin B. Hollander,et al.  Commentary: Virtual Planning , 2009 .

[7]  Fei Gao,et al.  Comparing Student Interactions in Second Life and Face-to-Face Role-playing Activities , 2008 .

[8]  John C. Park,et al.  Investigating Student Attitudes Toward a Synchronous, Online Graduate Course in a Multi-User Virtual Learning Environment , 2008 .

[9]  James Elliott,et al.  Help – Somebody Robbed my Second Life Avatar! , 2008 .

[10]  Michael Mayrath,et al.  Using Second Life in an English course: Designing class activities to address learning objectives , 2007 .

[11]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[12]  A. Bruckman,et al.  The MediaMOO Project , 1995 .

[13]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[14]  Edward Castronova.  The Right to Play , 2005 .

[15]  N. Obermeyer.  Tracking Public Participation in Urban Governance: Democracy and Data Privacy , 2013 .

[16]  Jenny Wongtangswad.  Uses of Second Life in Higher Education: Three Successful Cases , 2008 .

[17]  J. Michael Blocher,et al.  Using Constructionist Principals In Designing And Integrating Online Collaborative Interactions , 2001 .

[18]  R. Talab,et al.  Ethical and Legal Issues in Teaching and Learning in Second Life in a Graduate Online Course , 2010 .

[19]  B. Duranske.  Virtual Law: Navigating the Legal Landscape of Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[20]  Tuomo Kakkonen,et al.  Encyclopedia of Cyber Behavior Students ’ Cyber-Plagiarism , 2011 .

[21]  David DiRamio,et al.  Distance Education and Digital Intellectual Property Issues , 2004 .

[22]  Robbin Nicole Chapman.  Technology for intentional reflection and learning in constructionist cooperatives , 2006 .

[23]  Raph Koster,et al.  Developing Online Games: An Insider's Guide , 2003 .

[24]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[25]  Meredith Bricken,et al.  Virtual reality learning environments: potentials and challenges , 1991, COMG.

[26]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World , 1996 .

[27]  David J. Gunkel,et al.  Virtual Alterity and the Reformatting of Ethics , 2003 .

[28]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  An overview of ethical and social issues in shared virtual environments , 2007 .

[29]  Kimberley Marie Osberg,et al.  Constructivism in practice: The case for meaning-making in the virtual world , 1997 .

[30]  David Hung,et al.  From Traditional to Constructivist Epistemologies: A Proposed Theoretical Framework Based on Activity Theory for Learning Communities , 2006 .

[31]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. , 1992 .

[32]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[33]  Jr. Robert E. Boostrom.  The Social Construction of Virtual Reality and the Stigmatized Identity of the Newbie , 2008 .

[34]  Chris Dede,et al.  Distributed Learning: How New Technologies Promise a Richer Educational Experience. , 1997 .

[35]  Anne Gerdes,et al.  The Tension Between Human and Cyborg Ethics , 2011, Int. J. Cyber Ethics Educ..

[36]  Robert Zheng,et al.  Evolving Psychological and Educational Perspectives on Cyber Behavior , 2012 .

[37]  Thomas O. Blank,et al.  Cyber Support Venues for Cancer , 2012 .

[38]  Florence R. Sullivan.  Risk and Responsibility: A Self-Study of Teaching with Second Life , 2009 .

[39]  D. C. Phillips.  The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism , 1995 .

[40]  J. Merrills,et al.  Terms of Service , 2008 .

[41]  A. Chein.  A Practical Look at Virtual Property , 2012 .

[42]  Ren Reynolds.  Ethics and Practice in Virtual Worlds , 2012 .

[43]  Robin Ashford,et al.  Do Educators Need a Second Life? Exploring possibilities for technology-based distance learning in higher education , 2009 .

[44]  J. M. Kittross,et al.  The Academy and Cyberspace Ethics , 2003 .

[45]  Robert W. Kerbs,et al.  Social and ethical considerations in virtual worlds , 2005, Electron. Libr..

[46]  R. Kozinets.  The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities , 2002 .

[47]  Jeffrey C. Neely,et al.  Virtual Possibilities: A Constructivist Examination of the Educational Applications of Second Life. , 2010 .

[48]  Nona Muldoon,et al.  Second Life Machinima: Creating new opportunities for curriculum and instruction , 2009 .