The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology

PurposeGood background data are an important requirement in LCA. Practitioners generally make use of LCI databases for such data, and the ecoinvent database is the largest transparent unit-process LCI database worldwide. Since its first release in 2003, it has been continuously updated, and version 3 was published in 2013. The release of version 3 introduced several significant methodological and technological improvements, besides a large number of new and updated datasets. The aim was to expand the content of the database, set the foundation for a truly global database, support regionalized LCIA, offer multiple system models, allow for easier integration of data from different regions, and reduce maintenance efforts. This article describes the methodological developments.MethodsModeling choices and raw data were separated in version 3, which enables the application of different sets of modeling choices, or system models, to the same raw data with little effort. This includes one system model for Consequential LCA. Flow properties were added to all exchanges in the database, giving more information on the inventory and allowing a fast calculation of mass and other balances. With version 3.1, the database is generally water-balanced, and water use and consumption can be determined. Consumption mixes called market datasets were consistently added to the database, and global background data was added, often as an extrapolation from regional data.Results and discussionIn combination with hundreds of new unit processes from regions outside Europe, these changes lead to an improved modeling of global supply chains, and a more realistic distribution of impacts in regionalized LCIA. The new mixes also facilitate further regionalization due to the availability of background data for all regions.ConclusionsWith version 3, the ecoinvent database substantially expands the goals and scopes of LCA studies it can support. The new system models allow new, different studies to be performed. Global supply chains and market datasets significantly increase the relevance of the database outside of Europe, and regionalized LCA is supported by the data. Datasets are more transparent, include more information, and support, e.g., water balances. The developments also support easier collaboration with other database initiatives, as demonstrated by a first successful collaboration with a data project in Québec. Version 3 has set the foundation for expanding ecoinvent from a mostly regional into a truly global database and offers many new insights beyond the thousands of new and updated datasets it also introduced.

[1]  Réjean Samson,et al.  Implications of integrating electricity supply dynamics into life cycle assessment: a case study of renewable distributed generation , 2014 .

[2]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[3]  Roberto Turconi,et al.  Environmental impacts of future low-carbon electricity systems: Detailed life cycle assessment of a Danish case study , 2014 .

[4]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[5]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration , 2009 .

[6]  S. Suh,et al.  On the uncanny capabilities of consequential LCA , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  William F. Laurance,et al.  How Green Are Biofuels? , 2008, Science.

[8]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  Updated unit process data for coal-based energy in China including parameters for overall dispersions , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[9]  André Sternberg,et al.  Power-to-What? : Environmental assessment of energy storage systems , 2015 .

[10]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[11]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Part II: spatial differentiation in life-cycle assessment via the site-dependent characterisation of environmental impact from emissions , 1997 .

[12]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  More caution is needed when using life cycle assessment to determine energy return on investment (EROI) , 2015 .

[13]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  A tiered approach to estimate inventory data and impacts of chemical products and mixtures , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework , 2015 .

[15]  S. Pfister,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory and Carbon and Water FoodPrint of Fruits and Vegetables: Application to a Swiss Retailer , 2012, Environmental Science and Technology.

[16]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Christian Bauer,et al.  Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—part I: electricity generation , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Consequential environmental system analysis of expected offshore wind electricity production in Germany , 2008 .

[19]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology , 2000 .

[20]  André Bardow,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and utilization: avoiding the pitfalls , 2013 .

[21]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Allocation and 'what-if' scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. , 2007, Waste management.

[22]  B. Weidema Has ISO 14040/44 Failed Its Role as a Standard for Life Cycle Assessment? , 2014 .

[23]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[24]  J. Potting,et al.  Spatial Differentiation in the Characterisation of Photochemical Ozone Formation: The EDIP2003 Methodology , 2006 .

[25]  Lin Zhao,et al.  Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA , 2009 .

[27]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  The application of the pedigree approach to the distributions foreseen in ecoinvent v3 , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[28]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Systematic disaggregation: a hybrid LCI computation algorithm enhancing interpretation phase in LCA , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  M. Hauschild Spatial Differentiation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: A decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA , 2006 .

[30]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[31]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Two-step sensitivity testing of parametrized and regionalized life cycle assessments: methodology and case study. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment: how big is small enough? Methodology and case study of electricity generation. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fine chemical production: a case study of pharmaceutical synthesis , 2010 .

[35]  H. Wenzel,et al.  Bioenergy production from perennial energy crops: a consequential LCA of 12 bioenergy scenarios including land use changes. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  The Environmental Importance of Energy Use in Chemical Production , 2011 .

[37]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Interoperability between ecoinvent ver. 3 and US LCI database: a case study , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[38]  Marcel Gauch,et al.  Electric passenger car transport and passenger car life cycle inventories in ecoinvent version 3 , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[39]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Lights and shadows in consequential LCA , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[40]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[41]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Jürgen Reinhard,et al.  Updated and harmonised greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[43]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems , 1999 .

[44]  R. Heijungs,et al.  GLOBOX: A spatially differentiated global fate, intake and effect model for toxicity assessment in LCA. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  A Simons,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the European pressurized reactor and the influence of different fuel cycle strategies , 2012 .

[46]  Alexis Laurent,et al.  Environmental impacts of electricity generation at global, regional and national scales in 1980–2011: what can we learn for future energy planning? , 2015 .

[47]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessment , 2009 .

[48]  Christian Bauer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in power generation and industry in Europe , 2013 .

[49]  J. M. Earles,et al.  Consequential life cycle assessment: a review , 2011 .

[50]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part II): analyzing LCA results and comparison to version 2 , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[51]  Andrew Simons,et al.  Road transport: new life cycle inventories for fossil-fuelled passenger cars and non-exhaust emissions in ecoinvent v3 , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[52]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Multiregional environmental comparison of fossil fuel power generation—Assessment of the contribution of fugitive emissions from conventional and unconventional fossil resources , 2015 .

[53]  Anand R. Gopal,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Electric Power Systems , 2013 .

[54]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  The Quebec Life Cycle Inventory Database Project , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[55]  Karin Treyer,et al.  Human health impacts in the life cycle of future European electricity generation , 2014 .

[56]  Tobias Viere,et al.  The EcoSpold 2 format—why a new format? , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.