Accessible and Adaptive e-Learning Materials: Considerations for Design and Development

The aspect of accessibility and adaptivity is important for future of e-Learning applications. Creating e-Learning applications for everybody, including people with special needs, remains the question. The problem with development of e-Learning applications for everybody is that learner ability and weaknesses are usually neglected as important factors while developing applications. Most of nowadays applications offer lots of unclear information, unsuitable contents and non-adapted mechanisms. This paper suggests basic guidelines for successful design and structuring accessible and adaptive e-Learning applications that consider the requests and needs of people with special needs. It provides an example of design and realization of e-Learning application for receiving ECDL certificate, which includes easy adaptivity and basic accessibility factors. Experimental results of usability testing and pedagogical effectiveness have shown that material, designed following these guidelines, is appropriate and that there must be extra attention paid to learnability factor in the future.

[1]  Khalili Ahmad,et al.  The Effectiveness of Computer Applications , 1994 .

[2]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[3]  David Sloan,et al.  Forcing standardization or accommodating diversity?: a framework for applying the WCAG in the real world , 2005, W4A '05.

[4]  Matthias Schneider-Hufschmidt,et al.  Adaptive User Interfaces: Principles and Practice , 1993 .

[5]  Teresa Roselli,et al.  An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[6]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating For Learning, Usability and the Synergy between Them , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[7]  Renate Schulz-Zander,et al.  The role of ICT as a promoter of students' cooperation , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[8]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Usability engineering methods for software developers , 2005, CACM.

[9]  Allison Druin,et al.  Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning , 2000 .

[10]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden A Standard Approach for Full Visual Annotation of Auditorially Presented Information for Users, Including Those Who Are Deaf: ShowSounds. , 1993 .

[11]  L.P. Dringus,et al.  An adaptable usability heuristic checklist for online courses , 2005, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference.

[12]  Hahn-Ming Lee,et al.  Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Effectiveness of Computer-Based Adult Education: A Meta-Analysis , 1986 .

[14]  Sebastiano Bagnara,et al.  Multimedia systems in distance education: effects of usability on learning , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[15]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended Learning Environments: Definitions and Directions. , 2003 .

[16]  James Bosco,et al.  An analysis of evaluations of interactive video , 1986 .

[17]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications , 2008 .

[18]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Guidelines, standards, methods and processes for software accessibility , 2003, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[19]  Nishikant Sonwalkar,et al.  A New Methodology for Evaluation: The Pedagogical Rating of Online Courses. , 2002 .

[20]  Peter Charles Taylor,et al.  Moodle: Using Learning Communities to Create an Open Source Course Management System , 2003 .

[21]  Mary Corbett,et al.  SUMI: the Software Usability Measurement Inventory , 1993, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Chien-Hung Liu,et al.  Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..