Comparing one-step and two-step scatter correction and density reconstruction in x-ray CT

In this work, we compare one-step and two-step approaches for X-ray computed tomography (CT) scatter correction and density reconstruction. X-ray CT is an important imaging technique in medical and industrial applications. In many cases, the presence of scattered X-rays leads to loss of contrast and undesirable artifacts in reconstructed images. Many approaches to computationally removing scatter treat scatter correction as a preprocessing step that is followed by a reconstruction step. Treating scatter correction and reconstruction jointly as a single, more complicated optimization problem is less studied. It is not clear from the existing literature how these two approaches compare in terms of reconstruction accuracy. In this paper, we compare idealized versions of these two approaches with synthetic experiments. Our results show that the one-step approach can offer improved reconstructions over the two-step approach, although the gap between them is highly object-dependent.

[1]  Michael T. McCann,et al.  Local models for scatter estimation and descattering in polyenergetic X-ray tomography. , 2020, Optics express.

[2]  Natalia Gimelshein,et al.  PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.

[3]  Lei Xing,et al.  Projection-domain scatter correction for cone beam computed tomography using a residual convolutional neural network. , 2019, Medical physics.

[4]  Marc Kachelrieß,et al.  Deep Scatter Estimation (DSE): Accurate Real-Time Scatter Estimation for X-Ray CT Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network , 2018, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation.

[5]  J. Fessler,et al.  Modelling the physics in the iterative reconstruction for transmission computed tomography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  K. Klingenbeck,et al.  A general framework and review of scatter correction methods in cone beam CT. Part 2: scatter estimation approaches. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  Klaus Klingenbeck,et al.  A general framework and review of scatter correction methods in x-ray cone-beam computerized tomography. Part 1: Scatter compensation approaches. , 2011, Medical physics.

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[9]  J. Star-Lack,et al.  Improved scatter correction using adaptive scatter kernel superposition , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Iwan Kawrakow,et al.  Fast Monte Carlo calculation of scatter corrections for CBCT images , 2008 .

[11]  Thomas J. Asaki,et al.  Abel inversion using total variation regularization: applications , 2006 .

[12]  Gary Virshup,et al.  Comparison of scatter correction methods for CBCT , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  J. Shewchuk.  An Introduction to the Conjugate Gradient Method Without the Agonizing Pain , 1994 .

[14]  R. Kruger,et al.  Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering. , 1987, Medical physics.

[15]  Eric W. Hansen,et al.  Recursive methods for computing the Abel transform and its inverse , 1985 .

[16]  N. Estre,et al.  Evaluation of a scattering correction method for high energy tomography , 2018 .

[17]  Jean Michel Létang,et al.  Convolution-based scatter correction using kernels combining measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. , 2017, Journal of X-ray science and technology.

[18]  J. Lifton,et al.  An experimental study on the influence of scatter and beam hardening in x-ray CT for dimensional metrology , 2015 .

[19]  K. Klingenbeck-Regn,et al.  Efficient object scatter correction algorithm for third and fourth generation CT scanners , 1999, European Radiology.