User Experience Design for Inexperienced Gamers: GAP - Game Approachability Principles

Game Approachability Principles (GAP) is a set of useful guidelines for game designers to create better tutorials, and new player experiences—especially for the casual gamer. Developing better first learning levels can be a key step to ease the casual gamer into play and to do so proactively—at the conceptual design phase before it is too costly or cumbersome to restructure the tutorials as would be the case later in the development cycle. Thus, Game Approachability, in the context of game development, is defined as making games initially more friendly, fun, immersive, and accessible for those players who have the desire to play, yet do not always follow-through to actually playing the game. GAP has evolved through a series of stages assessing accessibility (NB Approachability and Accessibility are used interchangeably throughout this chapter) as a stand-alone, heuristic-based approach versus one-on-one User Testing. Outcomes suggest potential for GAP as an (1) effective Heuristic Evaluation, (2) adjunct to User Testing, and (3) as a proactive checklist of principles in to conceptually design the new player experience and/or tutorial to increase Game Approachability—for all levels of gamers.

[1]  J. Gee Learning by design: Games as learning machines , 2004 .

[2]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Heather W. Desurvire,et al.  Faster, cheaper!! Are usability inspection methods as effective as empirical testing? , 1994 .

[4]  Nick Yee,et al.  Motivations for Play in Online Games , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  Charlotte Wiberg,et al.  Game Usability Heuristics (PLAY) for Evaluating and Designing Better Games: The Next Iteration , 2009, HCI.

[6]  Melissa A. Federoff,et al.  HEURISTICS AND USABILITY GUIDELINES FOR THE CREATION AND EVALUATION OF FUN IN VIDEO GAMES , 2002 .

[7]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[8]  Elina M. I. Koivisto,et al.  Playability heuristics for mobile games , 2006, Mobile HCI.

[9]  Charlotte Wiberg,et al.  Master of the game: assessing approachability in future game design , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Bernard Chen,et al.  48 Differences Between Good and Bad Video Games: Game Playability Principles (PLAY) For Designing Highly Ranked Video Games , 2004 .

[11]  Kalle Jegers,et al.  Pervasive game flow: understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming , 2007, CIE.

[12]  Heather Desurvire,et al.  Using heuristics to evaluate the playability of games , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[13]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games , 2005, CIE.

[14]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[15]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[16]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines , 2005 .

[17]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy. I: V. S. Ramachandran (red.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (vol. s. ). New York: Academic Press. , 1994 .

[18]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[19]  John C. McCarthy,et al.  Technology as experience , 2004, INTR.

[20]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding experience in interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.