Development Process and Evaluation of the Ontology Visualization Tool Knoocks - A Case Study

Ontologies were becoming popular in various communities and disciplines over the past few years. The reason for their popularity is that they allow to specify concepts and their interconnections of a domain which are understandable by computers and by people. However without visualizations, ontologies especially large ones would be hard to comprehend by users. Visualizations are essential because they make ontologies with their structure more manageable. Furthermore, visualization tools are helpful to analyze the interconnections between concepts. For an effective usage of such visualization tools, it is necessary that the design is easy to understand, provides a good overview about the structure and allows fast access to detail information. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider the domain for which the ontology is developed along with its users and their needs. This paper presents the development process of Knoocks – a visualization tool for OWL Lite ontologies – where users were already involved during the process to improve the usability of the tool. Moreover, the presented case study underlines the importance of repeated usability evaluations during the development process to identify weak points of the design and missing features which are relevant for the

[1]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontologies: A silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce , 2002 .

[2]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach , 1992, TOGS.

[4]  Akrivi Katifori,et al.  Ontology visualization methods—a survey , 2007, CSUR.

[5]  Günter Wallner,et al.  Knoocks - A Visualization Approach for OWL Lite Ontologies , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[6]  Jennifer Sampson,et al.  Visualization in Ontology Tools , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[7]  Harith Alani.  TGVizTab: An Ontology Visualisation Extension for Protégé , 2003 .

[8]  Jochen Prümper.  Test It: ISONORM 9241/10 , 1999, HCI.

[9]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing The User Interface , 2013 .

[10]  Renate Motschnig,et al.  Knoocks: New Visualization Approach for Ontologies , 2008, 2008 12th International Conference Information Visualisation.

[11]  Jorge S. Cardoso.  The Semantic Web Vision: Where Are We? , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[12]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[13]  Chris North,et al.  An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[14]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[15]  Chris North,et al.  Toward measuring visualization insight , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[16]  J. B. Kruskal,et al.  Icicle Plots: Better Displays for Hierarchical Clustering , 1983 .

[17]  Padraic Neville,et al.  A comparison of 2-D visualizations of hierarchies , 2001, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001..

[18]  Simone Kriglstein.  User Requirements Analysis on Ontology Visualization , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[19]  Bijan Parsia,et al.  CropCircles: Topology Sensitive Visualization of OWL Class Hierarchies , 2006, SEMWEB.

[20]  Jaime Urquiza-Fuentes,et al.  Human-Centered Aspects , 2006, Human-Centered Visualization Environments.

[21]  Kevin Knight,et al.  Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies t , 1997 .