Hearing protection: surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways.

With louder and louder weapon systems being developed and military personnel being exposed to steady noise levels approaching and sometimes exceeding 150 dB, a growing interest in greater amounts of hearing protection is evident. When the need for communications is included in the equation, the situation is even more extreme. New initiatives are underway to design improved hearing protection, including active noise reduction (ANR) earplugs and perhaps even active cancellation of head-borne vibration. With that in mind it may be useful to explore the limits to attenuation, and whether they can be approached with existing technology. Data on the noise reduction achievable with high-attenuation foam earplugs, as a function of insertion depth, will be reported. Previous studies will be reviewed that provide indications of the bone-conduction (BC) limits to attenuation that, in terms of mean values, range from 40 to 60 dB across the frequencies from 125 Hz to 8 kHz. Additionally, new research on the effects of a flight helmet on the BC limits, as well as the potential attenuation from deeply inserted passive foam earplugs, worn with passive earmuffs, or with active-noise reduction (ANR) earmuffs, will be examined. The data demonstrate that gains in attenuation exceeding 10 dB above the head-not-covered limits can be achieved if the head is effectively shielded from acoustical stimulation.

[1]  R Hahn,et al.  [Bone conduction]. , 1972, JFORL. Journal francais d'oto-rhino-laryngologie; audiophonologie et chirurgie maxillo-faciale.

[2]  J. Melcher,et al.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E H Berger,et al.  Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J R Franks,et al.  Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  E H Berger Is real-ear attenuation at threshold a function of hearing level? , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  E. H. Berger,et al.  Laboratory Attenuation of Earmuffs and Earplugs Both Singly and in Combination , 1983 .

[7]  Ben T. Mozo,et al.  Subjective Evaluation of the Communications Earplug with Flexible Harness (CEP/FH) Among CH-47D Crewmembers. , 1996 .

[8]  J Tonndorf,et al.  Mechanical parameters of hearing by bone conduction. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Jozef J. Zwislocki In Search of the Bone‐Conduction Threshold in a Free Sound Field , 1957 .

[10]  J. Schroeter,et al.  The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.