The Impact of Computer Alienation on Information Technology INvestment Decisions: An Exploratory Cross-National Analysis

Organizations in both developed and developing countries use information technology to support their operational, tactical, and strategic processes (cf., Bogod, 1979; Cooper and Zmud, 1990). Any strategic competitive advantage of information technology, however, is contingent on acquisition and assimilation of information technology products and applications into organizational processes. Using a value expectancy approach, this study proposes an expanded model to examine the variables that correlate with information technology investment decisions. The theory of alienation from social psychology is used as a basis to systematically define and measure decision makers' attitudes and internal beliefs toward information technology in an investment context. Detailed discussion of the development of a computer alienation measurement scale is presented. The scale was used to collect data from 97 decision makers in the United States, a developed country, and Saudi Arabia, a developing country. Results provide empirical evidence on the appropriateness of applying the computer alienation construct to computer purchase decisions. Computer-alienated decision makers were found to be more inclined to resist information technology adoption by refraining from buying computers. This resistance was evident in both the U.S. and the Saudi samples. The study findings also indicate that decision-maker computer knowledge, computer experience, and education level are closely associated with alienated beliefs and attitudes toward information technology. Alienated decision makers reported paying less attention to information technology information sources. Assuming technologies can provide advantages, these findings point to the need for change agents to minimize alienating beliefs and attitudes.

[1]  M E Sexton,et al.  Alienation, dogmatism, and related personality characteristics. , 1983, Journal of clinical psychology.

[2]  Thomas J. Page,et al.  Causal Relationships in the Fishbein Behavioral Intention Model , 1984 .

[3]  Joel Lefkowitz,et al.  The redundancy of work alienation and job satisfaction: Some evidence of convergent and discriminant validity , 1980 .

[4]  Thomas J. Page,et al.  An Examination of the Convergent, Discriminant, and Predictive Validity of Fishbein's Behavioral Intention Model , 1982 .

[5]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[6]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[7]  Robert P. Minch,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Alienation: Toward a Definitive and Parsimonious Measure , 1990 .

[8]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? , 1986, CACM.

[9]  R. Zmud INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[10]  Richard W. Brislin,et al.  Non-Random Sampling of Individualsin Cross-Cultural Research , 1971 .

[11]  A. Liska A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude–behavior model. , 1984 .

[12]  M. Lystad,et al.  Social Alienation: A Review of Current Literature , 1971 .

[13]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  Adjusting Stated Intention Measures to Predict Trial Purchase of New Products: A Comparison of Models and Methods , 1989 .

[14]  R. Zeller,et al.  On the Reliability and Stability of Alienation Measures: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1980 .

[15]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[16]  Attila Yaprak,et al.  A Cross-National Comparison of Consumer Research Measures , 1987 .

[17]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[18]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[19]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design , 1986 .

[20]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[21]  P. Heaven,et al.  Alienation and its psychological correlates. , 1986, The Journal of social psychology.

[22]  Faith D. Gilroy,et al.  Computer Anxiety: Sex, Race and Age , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[23]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Attitudinal and Behavioral Correlates of Computer Anxiety , 1986 .

[24]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[26]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[27]  Khalil F. Matta,et al.  Barriers to computer-based message systems in developing countries , 1989, CSOC.

[28]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Is Attitudes: toward Theoretical and Definition Clarity , 1986, ICIS.

[29]  Barbara A. Kirsch,et al.  An Empirical Test of Robert Blauner's Ideas on Alienation in Work as Applied to Different Jobs in a White-Collar Setting. , 1972 .

[30]  Neil K. Allison A Psychometric Development of a Test for Consumer Alienation from the Marketplace , 1978 .

[31]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Trying to Consume , 1990 .

[32]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[33]  M. Seeman On The Meaning of Alienation , 1959 .

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[35]  Uma Sekaran,et al.  Methodological and Theoretical Issues and Advancements in Cross-Cultural Research , 1983 .

[36]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[37]  Michael R. Simonson,et al.  Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index , 1987 .

[38]  W. Doll,et al.  A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement , 1989 .

[39]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance , 1985 .

[40]  Alvin J. Silk,et al.  Measure Unreliability: A Hidden Threat to Cross-National Marketing Research? , 1981 .

[41]  H MCCLOSKY,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS OF ANOMY. , 1965, American sociological review.

[42]  P. R. Warshaw A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein , 1980 .

[43]  Abdulla Hasan Abdul-Gader End-User Computing Success Factors: Further Evidence from a Developing Nation , 1990 .

[44]  Arthur G. Neal,et al.  Alienation and Social Learning: A Study of Students in a Vocational Training Center , 1969 .

[45]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[46]  R. Brislin The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[47]  M. Schraml,et al.  The Psychological Impact of Automation on Library and Office Workers. , 1981 .

[48]  Nina M. Ray,et al.  Alienation and Computer User Attitudes , 1986, ICIS.