Optimization Formulations for the Design of Low Embodied Energy Structures Made from Reused Elements

The building sector is one of the major contributors to material resource consumption, greenhouse gas emission and waste production. Load-bearing systems have a particularly large environmental impact because of their material and energy intensive manufacturing process. This paper aims to address the reduction of building structures environmental impacts through reusing structural elements for multiple service lives. Reuse avoids sourcing raw materials and requires little energy for reprocessing. However, to design a new structure reusing elements available from a stock is a challenging problem of combinatorial nature. This is because the structural system layout is a result of the available elements’ mechanical and geometric properties. In this paper, structural optimization formulations are proposed to design truss systems from available stock elements. Minimization of weight, cut-off waste and embodied energy are the objective functions subject to ultimate and serviceability constraints. Case studies focusing on embodied energy minimization are presented for: (1) three roof systems with predefined geometry and topology; (2) a bridge structure whose topology is optimized using the ground structure approach; (3) a geometry optimization to better match the optimal topology from 2 and available stock element lengths. In order to benchmark the energy savings through reuse, the optimal layouts obtained with the proposed methods are compared to weight-optimized solutions made of new material. For these case studies, the methods proposed in this work enable reusing stock elements to design structures embodying up to 71% less energy and hence having a significantly lower environmental impact with respect to structures made of new material.

[1]  Bill Addis,et al.  Building with Reclaimed Components and Materials: A Design Handbook for Reuse and Recycling , 2006 .

[2]  Communication from the European commission to the council, the European parliament, the economic and social committee and committee of the regions , 2002 .

[3]  R. Haftka Simultaneous analysis and design , 1985 .

[4]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[5]  Klaus Dosch,et al.  Resource Efficiency in the Building Sector , 2018 .

[6]  Mathias Stolpe,et al.  Global optimization of discrete truss topology design problems using a parallel cut-and-branch method , 2008 .

[7]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  Influence of construction material uncertainties on residential building LCA reliability , 2017 .

[8]  Johan Löfberg,et al.  YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004 .

[9]  Harvey J. Greenberg,et al.  Automatic design of optimal structures , 1964 .

[10]  Endrit Hoxha,et al.  Structural Design with Reclaimed Materials: an Elastic Gridshell out of Skis , 2017 .

[11]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  Layout Optimization of Structures , 1995 .

[12]  W. Achtziger On simultaneous optimization of truss geometry and topology , 2007 .

[13]  Siegfried Bauer,et al.  Sustainable materials: With both eyes open , 2012 .

[14]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[15]  Mark Gorgolewski,et al.  Designing with reused building components: some challenges , 2008 .

[16]  Aurimas Bukauskas,et al.  Form-Fitting Strategies for Diversity-Tolerant Design , 2017 .

[17]  N. Pinardi,et al.  THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT STATE AND OUTLOOK 2010 MARINE AND COASTAL ENVIRONMENT , 2010 .

[18]  L. He,et al.  Rationalization of trusses generated via layout optimization , 2018 .

[19]  Johan Efberg,et al.  YALMIP : A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004 .

[20]  Catherine,et al.  Low carbon pathways for structural design : embodied life cycle impacts of building structures , 2017 .