Reengineering higher education: the case of an African institution

Strong tertiary education is seen as a critical success factor in the development of society at large in the developing world, of which most nations of Africa feature prominently. Although several countries embark on educational reforms and promise access to higher education for all, various problems, including distance, lack of resources and the complexity of delivery, are major hindrances to the process itself. The lack of enabling technologies has denied the potential fruits of higher education to some deserving and qualified citizens of developing countries. The problem can be alleviated by a more effective use of current educational assets coupled with distance education knowledge diffusion. Distance education (DE) is one such use of current educational assets through the infusion of information technology. Implementing DE in an effective manner relies on the process itself, the methodologies, techniques and tools. The various centres of delivery and classrooms must be connected: via radio, telephone, computer or other electronic means. This study explores the process of reengineering higher education through DE and proposes a Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) approach that addresses the major technological, political and economic issues faced during implementation.

[1]  Frank M. Bernt,et al.  Study practices and attitudes related to academic success in a distance learning programme , 1993 .

[2]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology , 1992 .

[3]  Mike Moore,et al.  Distance Education: A Systems View , 1995 .

[4]  Nada Trunk Sirca,et al.  Electronic learning in Slovenia , 2003 .

[5]  Joey F. George,et al.  Modern Systems Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[6]  Nil Whittington,et al.  Is instructional television educationally effective? A research review , 1987 .

[7]  Alana M. Halsne,et al.  Online versus Traditionally-Delivered Instruction: A Descriptive Study of Learner Characteristics in a Community College Setting. , 2002 .

[8]  E. Burge,et al.  Audio‐conferencing in graduate education: A case study , 1990 .

[9]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999 , 2001 .

[10]  Elaine D. Martin,et al.  Student achievement and attitude in a satellite‐delivered high school science course , 1993 .

[11]  M. Venkatraman It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition , 1994 .

[12]  M. Winston Egan Effective Television Teaching: Perceptions of Those Who Count Most...Distance Learners. , 1991 .

[13]  Alan G. Chute,et al.  Designing for International Teletraining , 1995 .

[14]  William E. Souder The effectiveness of traditional vs. satellite delivery in three management of technology master's degree programs , 1993 .

[15]  Barbara L. Ludlow A Comparison of Traditional and Distance Education Models. , 1994 .

[16]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  Keynote paper: measuring the value of online communities, leading to innovation and learning , 2003 .

[17]  Dan O. Coldeway Distance Education from the Learner's Perspective: The Results of Individual Learner Tracking at Athabasca University. REDEAL Research Report #10. Project REDEAL. Research and Evaluation of Distance Education for the Adult Learner. , 1980 .

[18]  Mark H. Rossman,et al.  Facilitating Distance Education , 1995 .

[19]  Michael G. Dolence,et al.  Transforming Higher Education: A Vision for Learning in the 21st Century , 1995 .

[20]  Lynda R. Ross,et al.  Relationships between Gender and Success in Distance Education Courses: A Preliminary Investigation. , 1990 .

[21]  D. Garrison A cognitive constructivist view of distance education: An analysis of teaching‐learning assumptions , 1993 .

[22]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .