Telephone conferences for fun: experimentation in people's homes

The paper illustrates how communication experiments may be carried out in a domestic recreational context. Participants situated in their homes were connected into group telephone conversations and simply asked to “chat and enjoy yourselves”. Following the conversation, participants provided Likert scale ratings of the experience. In addition, the conversations were recorded and analysed. A total of 211 participants took part in two experiments. Telephone groups had an average size of five people, each speaking in the same conversation from their individual homes. Comments from the participants and Likert rating scales indicated that it was a positive recreational experience. The primary manipulation in each experiment was intended to encourage spontaneous co-involvement of all of the group. In Experiment 1 this was done by changing the way participants were introduced to the group, in Experiment 2 the group was made more salient by providing each member with a list of names. Open ended responses obtained from telephone interviews with participants in Experiment 1 were used to construct a questionnaire for Experiment 2 to measure presence, involvement and communication efficacy. The measures extracted from transcripts included the average length of utterances and equality of contribution as well as a new measure, the number of lines to the first “flow episode” in the transcript. While neither of the manipulations produced significant effects on Likert scale ratings made after the sessions or the measures extracted from transcripts, the paper is able to recommend the measures used and to provide practical advice for other investigators seeking to run communication experiments in a recreational context.

[1]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Placement of Authority and Communication Pattern in Workplace Groups --- the Consequences for Innovation , 2022 .

[2]  Carole Edelsky Who's got the floor? , 1981, Language in Society.

[3]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Using familiar technologies in unfamiliar ways and learning from the old about the new , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[4]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Peripheral participation in video-mediated communication , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[6]  Siân E. Lindley Designing interfaces to afford enjoyable social interactions by collocated groups , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[7]  Alphonse Chapanis,et al.  Interactive human communication , 1975 .

[8]  E. Goffman Encounters; Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction , 1962 .

[9]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Video-Mediated Communication , 1997 .

[10]  Darren J. Reed Fun on the Phone: The Situated Experience of Recreational Telephone Conferences , 2005, Funology.

[11]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Funology: from usability to enjoyment , 2005 .

[12]  Daniele Nardi,et al.  Self-instructive spreadsheets: an environment for automatic knowledge acquisition and tutor generation , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  E. Goffman Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[14]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[15]  S. Garrod,et al.  Group Discussion as Interactive Dialogue or as Serial Monologue: The Influence of Group Size , 2000, Psychological science.

[16]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  Multi-mediating Multi-party Interactions , 1999, INTERACT.

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The measurement of flow in everyday life: toward a theory of emergent motivation. , 1992, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[18]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Hearing only one side of normal and mobile phone conversations , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: fluency and awareness of attentional focus , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..