Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management

Organizational context is created and renewed through tangible and concrete management actions. The context, in turn, influences the actions of all those within the company. In this article, we elaborate this theme of an interactive development of context and action that, we argue, lies at the core of a company's management process and is a key influencer of its performance. Based on a longitudinal field‐study in one company, we identify discipline, stretch, trust and support as the primary dimensions of organizational context and we describe how each of these dimensions can be developed and how these dimensions, in turn, influence the levels of individual initiative, mutual cooperation and collective learning within companies. Shaping the organizational context, we suggest, is the central task of general managers and we propose our model of context as a way to assess an organization's quality of management.

[1]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Some Problems in Conceptualizing Organizational Climate: A Case Study of a Bank , 1958 .

[2]  P. Bonacich,et al.  The Development of Trust and Mistrust in Mixed-Motive Games , 1970 .

[3]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[4]  H. R. Johnston A New Conceptualization of Source of Organizational Climate. , 1976 .

[5]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[6]  A. Pettigrew On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[7]  Henry Mintzberg An Emerging Strategy of "Direct" Research , 1979 .

[8]  J. Dickson,et al.  R&D Work Climate and Innovation in Semiconductors , 1983 .

[9]  Robert A. Burgelman A Model of the Interaction of Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy , 1983 .

[10]  Yvan Allaire,et al.  Theories of Organizational Culture , 1984 .

[11]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique That Works! , 1984 .

[12]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  J. Lewis,et al.  SOCIAL ATOMISM, HOLISM, AND TRUST , 1985 .

[14]  Richard T. Pascale,et al.  The Paradox of “Corporate Culture”: Reconciling Ourselves to Socialization , 1985 .

[15]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy. , 1985 .

[16]  J. Barney,et al.  Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? , 1986 .

[17]  P. Amsa ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND WORK GROUP BEHAVIOUR: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1986 .

[18]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  The economic efficiency of corporate culture , 1988 .

[19]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment , 1988, American journal of community psychology.

[20]  Wheelwright Sc,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989 .

[21]  Margarethe F. Wiersema,et al.  Gaining Strategic and Organizational Capability in a Turbulent Business Environment David Ulrich , 1989 .

[22]  R. Folger,et al.  Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions , 1989 .

[23]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF ECONOMIC AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS , 1989 .

[24]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination in a work organization. , 1989 .

[25]  K. Weick Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[26]  C. Prahalad,et al.  To revitalize corporate performance, we need a whole new model of strategy. Strategic intent. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[27]  Andy Hargreaves,et al.  Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality, collaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching , 1990 .

[28]  Henry Mintzberg The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management , 1990 .

[29]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[30]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[31]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[32]  D. Teece,et al.  Strategic management and economics , 1991 .

[33]  R. Calori,et al.  Corporate Culture and Economic Performance: A French Study , 1991 .

[34]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[35]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[36]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Strategic decision making , 1992 .

[37]  A. Pettigrew The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research , 1992 .

[38]  G. Gordon,et al.  Predicting Corporate Performance From Organizational Culture , 1992 .

[39]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[40]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Beyond the M-form: toward a managerial theory of the firm , 1993 .

[41]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Strategy as stretch and leverage. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[42]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural Justice Theory and the Multinational Corporation , 1993 .

[43]  R. Heck,et al.  Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model , 1993 .

[44]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization , 2000 .