Predicting the time course of grape ripening

Background and Aim:  To predict harvest time for logistic applications in vineyards and wineries, measurements of total soluble solids (TSS) are typically combined with projections assuming TSS increases at 1°Be/week. Here, three questions were asked: (i) what is the magnitude and direction of the bias in estimates of ripening assuming 1°Be/week across varieties, regions and seasons? (ii) what are the climatic drivers of this bias? and (iii) could thermal rates improve predictions? Methods and Results:  Actual TSS of Chardonnay, Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon was measured in commercial vineyards in Coonawarra, Barossa Valley and Riverland. Predictions used (i) the default 1°Be/week; (ii) variety- and location-specific chronological rates between 0.8 and 1.2°Be/week; and (iii) variety- and location-specific thermal rates between 0.009 and 0.019°Be/Cd. In eight of the nine cases, 1°Be/week biased ripening predictions. Seasonal bias correlated with evaporative demand in the Riverland and Coonawarra and with minimum temperature in the Barossa Valley. Thermal rates were not superior to calibrated chronological rates to predict ripening. Conclusion:  Locally calibrated rates significantly improved ripening predictions for major grapevine varieties in regions with contrasting climates and viticultural profiles. Significance of the Study:  Improved prediction of ripeness time would allow for better allocation of key resources in vineyards and wineries – labour, time, machinery, transport, analytical services, chemicals and storage.

[1]  P. Clingeleffer,et al.  Crop thinning (hand versus mechanical), grape maturity and anthocyanin concentration: outcomes from irrigated Cabernet Sauvignon ("Vitis vinifera L.") in a warm climate , 2006 .

[2]  P. Dry,et al.  The grapegrowing regions of Australia , 1995 .

[3]  M. Salam,et al.  Comparing Simulated and Measured Values Using Mean Squared Deviation and its Components , 2000 .

[4]  M. Matthews,et al.  Response of Fruit Growth and Ripening to Crop Level in Dry-Farmed Cabernet Sauvignon on Four Rootstocks , 2006, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[5]  B. G. Coombe,et al.  Modelling grapevine phenology against weather: Considerations based on a large data set , 1993 .

[6]  L. Williams,et al.  Validation of a Model for the Growth and Development of the Thompson Seedless Grapevine. II. Phenology , 1985, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[7]  V. Sadras,et al.  Advancement of grapevine maturity in Australia between 1993 and 2006: putative causes, magnitude of trends and viticultural consequences , 2008 .

[8]  Olivier Jacquet,et al.  ASYNCHRONOUS DYNAMICS OF GRAPEVINE (VITIS VINIFERA) MATURATION: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY FOR A MODELLING APPROACH , 2009 .

[9]  Paul R. Petrie,et al.  Climate shifts in south‐eastern Australia: early maturity of Chardonnay, Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon is associated with early onset rather than faster ripening , 2011 .

[10]  V. Sadras,et al.  Quantifying the onset, rate and duration of sugar accumulation in berries from commercial vineyards in contrasting climates of Australia , 2011 .

[11]  Serge Delrot,et al.  Physiological and modelling approaches to understand water and carbon fluxes during grape berry growth and quality development: a review , 2010 .

[12]  E. Magnanini,et al.  Effects of manipulated grape berry transpiration on post-veraison sugar accumulation , 1997 .

[13]  L. Bayındırlı DENSITY and VISCOSITY of GRAPE JUICE AS A FUNCTION of CONCENTRATION and TEMPERATURE , 1993 .

[14]  V. Sadras,et al.  Modelling variety-dependent dynamics of soluble solids and water in berries of Vitis vinifera , 2008 .

[15]  C. van Leeuwen,et al.  General phenological model to characterise the timing of flowering and veraison of Vitis vinifera L. , 2011 .

[16]  J. Paruelo,et al.  How to evaluate models : Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? , 2008 .

[17]  P. Dry,et al.  Response of Shiraz grapevines to five different training systems in the Barossa Valley, Australia , 2003 .