Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.

Sensorineural hearing loss has frequently been shown to result in a loss of frequency selectivity. Less is known about its effects on the level dependence of selectivity that is so prominent a feature of normal hearing. The aim of the present study is to characterize such changes in nonlinearity as manifested in the auditory filter shapes of listeners with mild/moderate hearing impairment. Notched-noise masked thresholds at 2 kHz were measured over a range of stimulus levels in hearing-impaired listeners with losses of 20-50 dB. Growth-of-masking functions for different notch widths are more parallel for hearing-impaired than for normal-hearing listeners, indicating a more linear filter. Level-dependent filter shapes estimated from the data show relatively little change in shape across level. The loss of nonlinearity is also evident in the input/output functions derived from the fitted filter shapes. Reductions in nonlinearity are clearly evident even in a listener with only 20-dB hearing loss.

[1]  Growth of masking in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1991, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[2]  B C Moore,et al.  Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids. , 1985, British journal of audiology.

[3]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns , 1987, Hearing Research.

[4]  D L Weber,et al.  Growth of masking and the auditory filter. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Oxenham,et al.  A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R. Freyman,et al.  Effects of stimulus level on forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and in noise. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  T Najenson,et al.  Frequency selectivity as a potential measure of noise damage susceptibility. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[8]  S Buus,et al.  Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  S Rosen,et al.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood threshold estimation with tone-in-noise masking , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[10]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  L E Humes,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E F Evans,et al.  Early detection of hearing damage in young listeners resulting from exposure to amplified music. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[13]  E. de Boer,et al.  Critical bands and sensorineural hearing loss. , 1974, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Frequency selectivity in workers with noise-induced hearing loss , 1992, Hearing Research.

[15]  S Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  A Faulkner,et al.  Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[17]  R A Lutfi,et al.  On the growth of masking asymmetry with stimulus intensity. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  L. Humes,et al.  Erratum: Auditory filter shapes in normal‐hearing, noise‐masked normal, and elderly listeners [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2903–2914 (1993)] , 1993 .

[19]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Frequency resolution as a function of hearing threshold level and age. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Characterizing Changes in Auditory Filter Bandwidth as a Function of Level , 1992 .

[21]  P. Dallos The active cochlea , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  R S Tyler,et al.  Frequency resolution and hearing loss. , 1982, British journal of audiology.

[23]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[27]  G F Pick,et al.  Level dependence of psychophysical frequency resolution and auditory filter shape. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  M R Leek,et al.  Auditory filter shapes of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners in continuous broadband noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Hallowell Davis,et al.  An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[30]  B. Moore,et al.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Growth of masking as a measure of response growth in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.