Efficient chemical and enzymatic saccharification of the lignocellulosic residue from Agave tequilana bagasse to produce ethanol by Pichia caribbica

Bagasse of Agave tequilana (BAT) is the residual lignocellulosic waste that remains from tequila production. In this study we characterized the chemical composition of BAT, which was further saccharified and fermented to produce ethanol. BAT was constituted by cellulose (42%), hemicellulose (20%), lignin (15%), and other (23%). Saccharification of BAT was carried out at 147°C with 2% sulfuric acid for 15 min, yielding 25.8 g/l of fermentable sugars, corresponding to 36.1% of saccharificable material (cellulose and hemicellulose contents, w/w). The remaining lignocellulosic material was further hydrolyzed by commercial enzymes, ~8.2% of BAT load was incubated for 72 h at 40°C rendering 41 g/l of fermentable sugars corresponding to 73.6% of the saccharificable material (w/w). Mathematic surface response analysis of the acid and enzymatic BAT hydrolysis was used for process optimization. The results showed a satisfactory correlation (R2 = 0.90) between the obtained and predicted responses. The native yeast Pichia caribbica UM-5 was used to ferment sugar liquors from both acid and enzymatic hydrolysis to ethanol yielding 50 and 87%, respectively. The final optimized process generated 8.99 g ethanol/50 g of BAT, corresponding to an overall 56.75% of theoretical ethanol (w/w). Thus, BAT may be employed as a lignocellulosic raw material for bioethanol production and can contribute to BAT residue elimination from environment.

[1]  Guido Zacchi,et al.  Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam‐pretreated bagasse using Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3400 and Pichia stipitis CBS6054 , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  Sergio Trejo Estrada Comparative hydrolysis and fermentation of sugarcane and agave bagasse , 2012 .

[3]  W. V. van Zyl,et al.  Generation of the improved recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB 3400 by random mutagenesis and physiological comparison with Pichia stipitis CBS 6054. , 2003, FEMS yeast research.

[4]  Yong Wang,et al.  Production of levulinic acid and use as a platform chemical for derived products , 2000 .

[5]  C. Kubicek,et al.  Carbon Source Control of Cellobiohydrolase I and II Formation by Trichoderma reesei , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[6]  G. Baker,et al.  Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. , 2009, Journal of biotechnology.

[7]  M. Taherzadeh,et al.  Ethanol production from hexoses, pentoses, and dilute-acid hydrolyzate by Mucor indicus. , 2005, FEMS yeast research.

[8]  Eulogio Castro,et al.  Evaluation of steam explosion pre-treatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of sunflower stalks. , 2008, Enzyme and microbial technology.

[9]  Shigeki Sawayama,et al.  Bioethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing xylose reductase, NADP(+)-dependent xylitol dehydrogenase, and xylulokinase. , 2008, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[10]  Ye Sun,et al.  Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[11]  M. Penttilä,et al.  Enzymatic Properties and Intracellular Localization of the Novel Trichoderma reesei β-Glucosidase BGLII (Cel1A) , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  R. Maleszka,et al.  The requirement of oxygen for incorporation of carbon from D-xylose and D-glucose by Pachysolen tannophilus. , 1984, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[13]  Miguel Angel,et al.  Comparative hydrolysis and fermentation of sugarcane and agave bagasse , 2012 .

[14]  M. Holtzapple,et al.  Benefits from tween during enzymic hydrolysis of corn stover , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  L. Lynd,et al.  Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[16]  Mats Galbe,et al.  Comparison of the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolyzates of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by steam explosion using different impregnating agents , 2002, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[17]  Yoshio Katakura,et al.  Strategies for reducing supplemental medium cost in bioethanol production from waste house wood hydrolysate by ethanologenic Escherichia coli: inoculum size increase and coculture with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2008, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[18]  T. P. Lyons,et al.  The alcohol textbook , 2003 .

[19]  L. Lynd,et al.  Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  G. Lidén,et al.  Designing simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for improved xylose conversion by a recombinant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2008, Journal of biotechnology.

[21]  B. L. Browning,et al.  Methods of wood chemistry , 1967 .

[22]  Y. Wan,et al.  Optimization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Wheat Straw Pretreated by Alkaline Peroxide Using Response Surface Methodology , 2009 .

[23]  Donal F Day,et al.  Hydrolysis of Ammonia-pretreated Sugar Cane Bagasse with Cellulase, β-Glucosidase, and Hemicellulase Preparations , 2008, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[24]  M. Galbe,et al.  Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation of glucose and xylose in steam-pretreated corn stover at high fiber content with Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3400. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[25]  G. Stephanopoulos Challenges in Engineering Microbes for Biofuels Production , 2007, Science.

[26]  K. Dam-Johansen,et al.  Effects of Substrate Loading on Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Viscosity of Pretreated Barley Straw , 2007, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.