Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983

A survey of more than 4,000 significant innovations and innovating firms in the UK from 1945-1983 shows that the scope and organisation of technological activities vary greatly as functions of firms' principal activities and size. 1. Technological opportunities and threats are greatest in firms in chemicals and engineering. Opportunities in such science-based and specialist supplier firms in general emerge horizontally in related product markets and downstream in user sectors. In scale-intensive e.g. steel, vehicles and supplier-dominated e.g. printing, construction firms, opportunities tend to be upstream in related production technologies. Breakthrough innovations in science-based firms also induce clusters of technological opportunities upstream for suppliers, horizontally for partners, and downstream for users. Their effective exploitation requires diversity of firms' technological activities greater than that strictly required for current output. 2. The nature of technological opportunities, and of organisation for their exploitation, also varies with firm size. Firms with fewer than 1,000 employees have major opportunities with specialised strategies in mechanical engineering and instruments. The prevalence of broad front technological strategies, and of divisionalisation, increases sharply with firm size, together with dependence on formal R and D activities. The size of innovating divisions has diminished sharply over the period. Divisionalisation improves the "goodness of fit" between the core business of innovating divisions and the innovations themselves, but 40% have remained consistently outside the core business of divisions. 3. These findings help identify the key tasks of technological strategy in firms in different industries, and of different sizes. Thus, in large firms, divisionalisation can create the small size of unit conducive to effective implementation, but it cannot absolve central management from the continuous task of matching technological opportunities with organisational forms and boundaries.

[1]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Invasion of a Stable Business by Radical Innovation , 1985 .

[2]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Sectoral patterns of production and use of innovations in the UK: 1945–1983 , 1988 .

[3]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977 .

[4]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[5]  J. Hassid.  RECENT EVIDENCE ON CONGLOMERATE DIVERSIFICATION IN U.K. MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY , 1975 .

[6]  Daniel Roos,et al.  THE FUTURE OF THE AUTOMOBILE , 1982 .

[7]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[8]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[9]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[10]  B. Zirger,et al.  The new product learning cycle , 1985 .

[11]  Donald Harris,et al.  Benetton: Information Technology in Production and Distribution: A case study of the innovative potential of traditional sectors: F. Belussi, (SPRU occational papers no. 25) (SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, 1987) pp. 91, [UK pound]6.00 , 1988 .

[12]  D. Mowery.  The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940 , 1983 .

[13]  F. Kodama,et al.  Technological Diversification of Japanese Industry , 1986, Science.

[14]  Noriyuki Doi,et al.  Diversification and R & D activity in Japanese manufacturing firms , 1985 .

[15]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[16]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[17]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Technological Pioneering and Competitive Advantage: The Birth of the VCR Industry , 1987 .

[18]  E. Biggadike,et al.  Entry, strategy and performance , 1976 .

[19]  Jon Didrichsen.  The Development of Diversified and Conglomerate Firms in the United States, 1920–1970 , 1972, Business History Review.

[20]  A. Chandler,et al.  Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of Industrial Enterprise. , 1963 .

[21]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Corporate diversification: Entry, strategy, and performance , 1984 .

[22]  R. Barras.  Towards a theory of innovation in services , 1986 .

[23]  The R&D performance through time of young, high-technology firms: Methodology and an illustration , 1982 .

[24]  C. H. Berry.  Corporate Growth and Diversification , 1971, Journal law and economy.

[25]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[26]  M. Aoki.  Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm , 2013 .

[27]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  A process model for industrial new product development , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[28]  F. Kodama,et al.  Japanese innovation in mechatronics technology , 1986 .

[29]  M. Utton.  Diversification and Competition , 1979, National Institute Economic Review.

[30]  B. Zirger,et al.  A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.