Prestack data enhancement with phase corrections in time‐frequency domain guided by local multidimensional stacking

ABSTRACT We present a new approach to enhancing weak prestack reflection signals without sacrificing higher frequencies. As a first step, we employ known multidimensional local stacking to obtain an approximate ‘model of the signal’. Guided by phase spectra from this model, we can detect very weak signals and make them visible and coherent by ‘repairing’ corrupted phase of original data. Both presented approaches – phase substitution and phase sign corrections – show good performance on complex synthetic and field data suffering from severe near‐surface scattering where conventional processing methods are rendered ineffective. The methods are mathematically formulated as a special case of time‐frequency masking (common in speech processing) combined with the signal model from local stacking. This powerful combination opens the avenue for a completely new family of approaches for multi‐channel seismic processing that can address seismic processing of land data with nodes and single sensors in the desert environment.

[1]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  Time-Frequency Masking for Speech Separation and Its Potential for Hearing Aid Design , 2008 .

[2]  Evgeny Landa,et al.  Operator‐oriented CRS interpolation , 2009 .

[3]  E. Lichman Automated Phase-based Moveout Correction , 1999 .

[4]  Peter Hubral,et al.  Common‐reflection‐surface (CRS) stack for common offset , 2001 .

[5]  Jonathan Le Roux,et al.  Phase-sensitive and recognition-boosted speech separation using deep recurrent neural networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[6]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  The Essence of Phase In Seismic Data Processing And Inversion , 2007 .

[7]  How non-hyperbolic MultiFocusing improves depth imaging , 2011 .

[8]  M. Baykulov,et al.  Prestack seismic data enhancement with partial common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack , 2009 .

[9]  Scott Rickard,et al.  Blind separation of speech mixtures via time-frequency masking , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  Bülent Tezkan,et al.  Unmanned aircraft system proves itself as a geophysical measuring platform for aeromagnetic surveys , 2011 .

[11]  A.V. Oppenheim,et al.  The importance of phase in signals , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[12]  Walter Söllner,et al.  Finite‐offset common reflection surface stack using global optimisation for parameter estimation: a land data example , 2017 .

[13]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  Time-Frequency Masking in the Complex Domain for Speech Dereverberation and Denoising , 2017, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[14]  Wei Jiang,et al.  The optimal ratio time-frequency mask for speech separation in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Liliana Borcea,et al.  Coherent interferometric imaging in clutter , 2006 .