Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.

[1]  Yeganeh Memari,et al.  Marginal Adaptation of CAD/CAM All‐Ceramic Crowns Made by Different Impression Methods: A Literature Review , 2019, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Full arch precision of six intraoral scanners in vitro. , 2019, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[3]  Mark Ludlow,et al.  Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  A. Mehl,et al.  Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. , 2019, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[5]  Hae-Young Kim,et al.  Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows. , 2019, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[6]  Joshua C Treesh,et al.  Complete‐arch accuracy of intraoral scanners , 2018, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  M. Kanazawa,et al.  Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner. , 2018, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[8]  Noriyuki Wakabayashi,et al.  Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible. , 2018, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[9]  Yasser Haddadi,et al.  Effect of Software Version on the Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanning Device. , 2018, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[10]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[11]  M. Finkelman,et al.  An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems , 2017, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[12]  Chikayuki Odaira,et al.  Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. , 2017, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[13]  Philip Robinson,et al.  Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression , 2017, Journal of healthcare engineering.

[14]  Albert Mehl,et al.  Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo , 2017, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[15]  June-Sung Shim,et al.  Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Minho Chang,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy and precision of four intraoral scanners with 70% reduced inlay and four-unit bridge models of international standard. , 2017, Dental materials journal.

[17]  Konstantinos Chochlidakis,et al.  Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  Vito Renó,et al.  A Modified Iterative Closest Point Algorithm for 3D Point Cloud Registration , 2016, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[19]  Jin-Hun Jeon,et al.  Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  Tariq F Alghazzawi.  Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. , 2016, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[21]  Y. Chun,et al.  A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction , 2016, Korean journal of orthodontics.

[22]  D. Edelhoff,et al.  Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[23]  T. Attin,et al.  In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions , 2016, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[24]  J. Güth,et al.  Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[25]  B. Wöstmann,et al.  Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[26]  A. Mehl,et al.  In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. , 2015, Quintessence international.

[27]  Gary D. Hack,et al.  Evaluation of the Accuracy of Six Intraoral Scanning Devices: An in-vitro Investigation. , 2015 .

[28]  R. Nedelcu,et al.  Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  E. Yuzbasioglu,et al.  Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes , 2014, BMC oral health.

[30]  Tabea V Flügge,et al.  Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[31]  Daniel Edelhoff,et al.  Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing , 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[32]  A. Mehl,et al.  Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. , 2011, International journal of computerized dentistry.