Estimation of kinetic and thermodynamic ligand-binding parameters using computational strategies.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Eyring. The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions , 1935 .
[2] M. Perutz,et al. Structure of Hæmoglobin: A Three-Dimensional Fourier Synthesis at 5.5-Å. Resolution, Obtained by X-Ray Analysis , 1960, Nature.
[3] G. Torrie,et al. Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .
[4] M. Karplus,et al. Method for estimating the configurational entropy of macromolecules , 1981 .
[5] K. Laidler,et al. Development of transition-state theory , 1983 .
[6] W. Gilbert. Origin of life: The RNA world , 1986, Nature.
[7] P. Wolynes,et al. Intermediates and barrier crossing in a random energy model , 1989 .
[8] R. Wade,et al. New hydrogen-bond potentials for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. , 1989, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[9] R. Swendsen,et al. THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .
[10] PatrickY.-S. Lam,et al. Rational design of potent, bioavailable, nonpeptide cyclic ureas as HIV protease inhibitors. , 1994, Science.
[11] J. Dunitz. The entropic cost of bound water in crystals and biomolecules. , 1994, Science.
[12] P. Tavan,et al. Ligand Binding: Molecular Mechanics Calculation of the Streptavidin-Biotin Rupture Force , 1996, Science.
[13] J. Ladbury. Just add water! The effect of water on the specificity of protein-ligand binding sites and its potential application to drug design. , 1996, Chemistry & biology.
[14] K. Dill,et al. From Levinthal to pathways to funnels , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.
[15] J. Mccammon,et al. Electrostatic Influence on the Kinetics of Ligand Binding to Acetylcholinesterase , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[16] Y. Sugita,et al. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .
[17] I. Kuntz,et al. The maximal affinity of ligands. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] K. Dill,et al. The Strength of Hydrogen Bonds in Liquid Water and Around Nonpolar Solutes , 2000 .
[19] R. Nussinov,et al. Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[20] G. Gilli,et al. Towards an unified hydrogen-bond theory , 2000 .
[21] R. Norel,et al. Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.
[22] R. Wade,et al. How do substrates enter and products exit the buried active site of cytochrome P450cam? 1. Random expulsion molecular dynamics investigation of ligand access channels and mechanisms. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[23] U. Gether. Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.
[24] K. Schulten,et al. Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.
[25] A. Warshel,et al. What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.
[26] A. Laio,et al. Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[27] V. Hruby. Designing peptide receptor agonists and antagonists , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[28] Early mechanistic events in biotin dissociation from streptavidin , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.
[29] L. Tong,et al. Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase by utilizing a novel allosteric binding site , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.
[30] S. Takada,et al. On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction , 2002 .
[31] Marcel L. Verdonk,et al. The consequences of translational and rotational entropy lost by small molecules on binding to proteins , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[32] Gerhard Klebe,et al. Utilising structural knowledge in drug design strategies: applications using Relibase. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[33] Xiaomin Luo,et al. Steered molecular dynamics simulation on the binding of NNRTI to HIV-1 RT. , 2003, Biophysical journal.
[34] Richard H. Henchman,et al. The dynamics of ligand barrier crossing inside the acetylcholinesterase gorge. , 2003, Biophysical journal.
[35] J. Mongan,et al. Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.
[36] M. Karplus,et al. How Enzymes Work: Analysis by Modern Rate Theory and Computer Simulations , 2004, Science.
[37] Johannes C. Hermann,et al. A combined QM/MM approach to protein--ligand interactions: polarization effects of the HIV-1 protease on selected high affinity inhibitors. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[38] J. Bajorath,et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[39] A. Laio,et al. Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[40] Jeremy C. Smith,et al. Protein/ligand binding free energies calculated with quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[41] A. Laio,et al. Assessing the accuracy of metadynamics. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[42] G. Hummer,et al. Reaction coordinates and rates from transition paths. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[43] J. Gready,et al. Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design , 2006, Medicinal research reviews.
[44] G. Klebe. Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations , 2006, Drug Discovery Today.
[45] E. Vanden-Eijnden,et al. A temperature accelerated method for sampling free energy and determining reaction pathways in rare events simulations , 2006 .
[46] H. Senn,et al. QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems , 2006 .
[47] D. Truhlar,et al. QM/MM: what have we learned, where are we, and where do we go from here? , 2007 .
[48] John P. Overington,et al. How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[49] A. Wand,et al. Characterization of the fast dynamics of protein amino acid side chains using NMR relaxation in solution. , 2006, Chemical reviews.
[50] R. Copeland,et al. Drug–target residence time and its implications for lead optimization , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[51] P. V. Hippel. From "Simple" DNA-Protein Interactions to the Macromolecular Machines of Gene Expression , 2007 .
[52] A. Laio,et al. A bias-exchange approach to protein folding. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[53] S. Moro,et al. The ATP‐Binding Site of Protein Kinase CK2 Holds a Positive Electrostatic Area and Conserved Water Molecules , 2007, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.
[54] A. Wand,et al. Conformational entropy in molecular recognition by proteins , 2007, Nature.
[55] R. Friesner,et al. Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin‐relaxation , 2008, Proteins.
[56] M. Peräkylä. Ligand unbinding pathways from the vitamin D receptor studied by molecular dynamics simulations , 2009, European Biophysics Journal.
[57] M. Parrinello,et al. Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method. , 2008, Physical review letters.
[58] P. Ball. Water as an active constituent in cell biology. , 2008, Chemical reviews.
[59] A. Laio,et al. Metadynamics: a method to simulate rare events and reconstruct the free energy in biophysics, chemistry and material science , 2008 .
[60] B. Berne,et al. Role of the active-site solvent in the thermodynamics of factor Xa ligand binding. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[61] B. Brooks,et al. Multiscale methods for macromolecular simulations. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.
[62] Lina M. Nilsson,et al. Beyond induced-fit receptor-ligand interactions: structural changes that can significantly extend bond lifetimes. , 2008, Structure.
[63] J. Šponer,et al. Theoretical studies of RNA catalysis: hybrid QM/MM methods and their comparison with MD and QM. , 2009, Methods.
[64] T. Oas,et al. Conformational selection or induced fit: A flux description of reaction mechanism , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[65] A. Laio,et al. Substrate binding mechanism of HIV-1 protease from explicit-solvent atomistic simulations. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[66] Kateri H. DuBay,et al. Calculation of proteins' total side-chain torsional entropy and its influence on protein-ligand interactions. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.
[67] N. Vermeulen,et al. The role of water molecules in computational drug design. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[68] P. Tonge,et al. Drug-target residence time: critical information for lead optimization. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[69] Vijay S. Pande,et al. Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask. , 2010, Methods.
[70] C. Higgs,et al. Hydration Site Thermodynamics Explain SARs for Triazolylpurines Analogues Binding to the A2A Receptor. , 2010, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[71] M. Trevethick,et al. Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation , 2010, British journal of pharmacology.
[72] A. Cavalli,et al. Molecular basis of cyclooxygenase enzymes (COXs) selective inhibition , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[73] Albert C. Pan,et al. Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[74] F. J. Luque,et al. Shielded hydrogen bonds as structural determinants of binding kinetics: application in drug design. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[75] Angelo D. Favia,et al. Substrate Binding Process and Mechanistic Functioning of Type 1 11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase from Enhanced Sampling Methods , 2011, PloS one.
[76] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Quantum mechanical binding free energy calculation for phosphopeptide inhibitors of the Lck SH2 domain , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..
[77] M. Holloway,et al. Thermodynamics of ligand binding and efficiency. , 2011, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[78] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Computational and experimental studies of the interaction between phospho-peptides and the C-terminal domain of BRCA1 , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[79] G. de Fabritiis,et al. Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[80] F. Diederich,et al. Aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition: energetics and structures. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.
[81] David L Mobley,et al. Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.
[82] J. Kästner. Umbrella sampling , 2011 .
[83] M. Parrinello,et al. Metadynamics with Adaptive Gaussians. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[84] F. Noé,et al. Calculating kinetics and pathways of protein-ligand association. , 2012, European journal of cell biology.
[85] Gregory A Ross,et al. Rapid and Accurate Prediction and Scoring of Water Molecules in Protein Binding Sites , 2012, PloS one.
[86] Levi C. T. Pierce,et al. Routine Access to Millisecond Time Scale Events with Accelerated Molecular Dynamics , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[87] Samuel Genheden,et al. A semiempirical approach to ligand‐binding affinities: Dependence on the Hamiltonian and corrections , 2012, J. Comput. Chem..
[88] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. Methyl effects on protein-ligand binding. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[89] T. Woolf,et al. Towards the prediction of order parameters from molecular dynamics simulations in proteins. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.
[90] K. D. Collins. Why continuum electrostatics theories cannot explain biological structure, polyelectrolytes or ionic strength effects in ion-protein interactions. , 2012, Biophysical chemistry.
[91] P. Seeman,et al. Clozapine, atypical antipsychotics, and the benefits of fast-off D2 dopamine receptor antagonism , 2012, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.
[92] E. Di Cera,et al. Conformational selection or induced fit? A critical appraisal of the kinetic mechanism. , 2012, Biochemistry.
[93] M. Parrinello,et al. Sampling protein motion and solvent effect during ligand binding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[94] J. Mccammon,et al. Population Based Reweighting of Scaled Molecular Dynamics , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[95] M. Parrinello,et al. Funnel metadynamics as accurate binding free-energy method , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[96] Jianhan Chen,et al. Efficiency of Adaptive Temperature-Based Replica Exchange for Sampling Large-Scale Protein Conformational Transitions. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[97] Kai Wang,et al. Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[98] Albert C. Pan,et al. Molecular determinants of drug-receptor binding kinetics. , 2013, Drug discovery today.
[99] Francesca Deflorian,et al. High end GPCR design: crafted ligand design and druggability analysis using protein structure, lipophilic hotspots and explicit water networks , 2013, In Silico Pharmacology.
[100] M. Parrinello,et al. From metadynamics to dynamics. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[101] Lin Li,et al. On the Dielectric “Constant” of Proteins: Smooth Dielectric Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Its Implementation in DelPhi , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[102] G. Dahl,et al. Pharmacokinetics and the drug-target residence time concept. , 2013, Drug discovery today.
[103] G. Whitesides,et al. Water networks contribute to enthalpy/entropy compensation in protein-ligand binding. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[104] Jonathan W. Essex,et al. Water Network Perturbation in Ligand Binding: Adenosine A2A Antagonists as a Case Study , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[105] Heike Schönherr,et al. Profound methyl effects in drug discovery and a call for new C-H methylation reactions. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.
[106] D. Shaw. Millisecond-Long Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Proteins on a Special-Purpose Machine , 2013 .
[107] U. Ryde. A fundamental view of enthalpy–entropy compensation , 2014 .
[108] R. Altman,et al. Cloud-based simulations on Google Exacycle reveal ligand-modulation of GPCR activation pathways , 2013, Nature chemistry.
[109] E. Di Cera,et al. Essential role of conformational selection in ligand binding. , 2014, Biophysical chemistry.
[110] Andrea Cavalli,et al. Steered Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Studying Protein-Ligand Interaction in Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[111] Shuo Gu,et al. Quantitatively Characterizing the Ligand Binding Mechanisms of Choline Binding Protein Using Markov State Model Analysis , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[112] Michele Parrinello,et al. Assessing the Reliability of the Dynamics Reconstructed from Metadynamics. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[113] Stefano Moro,et al. Supervised Molecular Dynamics (SuMD) as a Helpful Tool To Depict GPCR-Ligand Recognition Pathway in a Nanosecond Time Scale , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[114] Frank Noé,et al. Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.
[115] Stefano Moro,et al. Bridging Molecular Docking to Membrane Molecular Dynamics To Investigate GPCR-Ligand Recognition: The Human A2A Adenosine Receptor as a Key Study , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[116] S. Genheden,et al. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[117] J. Mccammon,et al. Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations of ligand binding to a muscarinic G-protein-coupled receptor , 2015, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.
[118] Jonathan S. Mason,et al. Decoding the Role of Water Dynamics in Ligand-Protein Unbinding: CRF1R as a Test Case , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[119] F. Totzke,et al. Optimization of potent DFG-in inhibitors of platelet derived growth factor receptorβ (PDGF-Rβ) guided by water thermodynamics. , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[120] S. Moro,et al. Understanding allosteric interactions in G protein-coupled receptors using Supervised Molecular Dynamics: A prototype study analysing the human A3 adenosine receptor positive allosteric modulator LUF6000. , 2015, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[121] Luca Mollica,et al. Kinetics of protein-ligand unbinding via smoothed potential molecular dynamics simulations , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[122] A. Cavalli,et al. The ligand binding mechanism to purine nucleoside phosphorylase elucidated via molecular dynamics and machine learning , 2015, Nature Communications.
[123] F. Noé,et al. Protein conformational plasticity and complex ligand-binding kinetics explored by atomistic simulations and Markov models , 2015, Nature Communications.
[124] J. Ulander,et al. Ligand Binding Thermodynamics in Drug Discovery: Still a Hot Tip? , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[125] A. Minarini,et al. An optimized polyamine moiety boosts the potency of human type II topoisomerase poisons as quantified by comparative analysis centered on the clinical candidate F14512. , 2015, Chemical communications.
[126] M. Parrinello,et al. Kinetics of protein–ligand unbinding: Predicting pathways, rates, and rate-limiting steps , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[127] R. Leurs,et al. Ligand Residence Time at G-protein–Coupled Receptors—Why We Should Take Our Time To Study It , 2015, Molecular Pharmacology.
[128] S. Moro,et al. Exploring the recognition pathway at the human A2A adenosine receptor of the endogenous agonist adenosine using supervised molecular dynamics simulations , 2015 .
[129] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Predicting bioactive conformations and binding modes of macrocycles , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[130] L. Pardo,et al. The pathway of ligand entry from the membrane bilayer to a lipid G protein-coupled receptor , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[131] Albert C. Pan,et al. Molecular Basis of Ligand Dissociation from the Adenosine A2A Receptor , 2016, Molecular Pharmacology.
[132] Michael S Bodnarchuk,et al. Water, water, everywhere… It's time to stop and think. , 2016, Drug discovery today.
[133] B. Berne,et al. Spectral gap optimization of order parameters for sampling complex molecular systems , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[134] I. Dale,et al. Can residence time offer a useful strategy to target agonist drugs for sustained GPCR responses? , 2016, Drug discovery today.
[135] J. Izaguirre,et al. Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations of the octopamine receptor using GPUs: discovery of an alternate agonist‐binding position , 2016, Proteins.
[136] Hakan Gunaydin,et al. Stacking with No Planarity? , 2016, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[137] C. Tautermann. Impact, determination and prediction of drug-receptor residence times for GPCRs. , 2016, Current opinion in pharmacology.
[138] A. Cavalli,et al. Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Kinetic Measurements to Estimate and Predict Protein-Ligand Residence Times. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[139] B. Berne,et al. How wet should be the reaction coordinate for ligand unbinding? , 2016, The Journal of chemical physics.
[140] R. Copeland. The drug–target residence time model: a 10-year retrospective , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[141] Stefano Moro,et al. Deciphering the Complexity of Ligand-Protein Recognition Pathways Using Supervised Molecular Dynamics (SuMD) Simulations , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[142] Nargis Tabassum,et al. Investigation of α-conotoxin unbinding using umbrella sampling. , 2016, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[143] Huanxiang Liu,et al. Computational study on the binding and unbinding mechanism of HCV NS5B with the inhibitor GS-461203 and substrate using conventional and steered molecular dynamics simulations , 2016 .