Co-Hyperintensionality: CO-HYPERINTENSIONALITY

[1]  D. Chalmers.  Propositions and Attitude Ascriptions: A Fregean Account , 2011, Noûs.

[2]  Marie Duzí,et al.  Structural Isomorphism of Meaning and Synonymy , 2014, Computación y Sistemas.

[3]  Yiannis N. Moschovakis,et al.  A Logical Calculus of Meaning and Synonymy , 2006 .

[4]  Reinhard Muskens.  Intensional Models for the Theory of Types , 2007, J. Symb. Log..

[5]  Edwin D. Mares,et al.  Who's Afraid of Impossible Worlds? , 1997, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[6]  David A. Vander Laan,et al.  The Ontology of Impossible Worlds , 1997, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[7]  S. Soames.  Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content , 1987 .

[8]  Greg Restall,et al.  Ways Things Can't Be , 1997, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[9]  Marie Duzí,et al.  Transparent quantification into hyperintensional objectual attitudes , 2014, Synthese.

[10]  David Ripley.  Structures and circumstances: two ways to fine-grain propositions , 2012, Synthese.

[11]  A. Kratzer.  Modals and ConditionalsNew and Revised Perspectives , 2012 .

[12]  M. Jago.  Impossible Worlds: Impossible Worlds , 2015 .

[13]  Marie Duzí,et al.  Procedural Semantics for Hyperintensional Logic - Foundations and Applications of Transparent Intensional Logic , 2010, Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science.

[14]  Kit Fine,et al.  Truth-Maker Semantics for Intuitionistic Logic , 2014, J. Philos. Log..

[15]  Carl Pollard,et al.  Agnostic hyperintensional semantics , 2013, Synthese.

[16]  Daniel Nolan,et al.  Impossible Worlds: A Modest Approach , 1997, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..

[17]  Edward N. Zalta,et al.  A Classically-Based Theory of Impossible Worlds , 1997, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..