The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life

History repeatedly demonstrates that rural communities have unique technological needs. Yet, we know little about how rural communities use modern technologies, so we lack knowledge on how to design for them. To address this gap, our empirical paper investigates behavioral differences between more than 3,000 rural and urban social media users. Using a dataset collected from a broadly popular social network site, we analyze users' profiles, 340,000 online friendships and 200,000 interpersonal messages. Using social capital theory, we predict differences between rural and urban users and find strong evidence supporting our hypotheses. Namely, rural people articulate far fewer friends online, and those friends live much closer to home. Our results also indicate that the groups have substantially different gender distributions and use privacy features differently. We conclude by discussing design implications drawn from our findings; most importantly, designers should reconsider the binary friend-or-not model to allow for incremental trust-building.

[1]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  The dynamics of mass interaction , 1998, CSCW '98.

[2]  Edwin B. Parker,et al.  Rural America in the information age : telecommunication policy for rural development , 1989 .

[3]  D. Sornette,et al.  Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales , 1998, cond-mat/9801293.

[4]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[5]  Sue Kilpatrick,et al.  What is Social Capital? A Study of Interaction in a Rural Community , 1999 .

[6]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  The truth about lying in online dating profiles , 2007, CHI.

[7]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[8]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Social networking websites and teens: an overview , 2007 .

[9]  Barbara A. Kimmelman :Consumers in the Country: Technology and Social Change in Rural America , 2005 .

[10]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1993, Business History Review.

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[13]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[14]  Rudi Volti,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1992 .

[15]  Diane Zimmerman Umble The coming of the telephone to plain country: A study of Amish and Mennonite resistance in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania at the turn of the century , 1991 .

[16]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friendster and publicly articulated social networking , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[17]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[18]  Huddleston Hall Rural Voting in the 2004 Election , 2006 .

[19]  Judith Donath,et al.  Identity and deception in the virtual community , 1998 .

[20]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception , 2002, CSCW '02.

[21]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network , 2006, ArXiv.

[22]  P. Resnick Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital , 2001 .

[23]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Manuel Castells,et al.  The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society , 2001 .

[25]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[26]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[28]  N. Baym Interpersonal Life Online , 2002 .

[29]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  Andrew M. Isserman,et al.  Competitive Advantages of Rural America in the Next Century , 2000 .

[31]  Pippa Norris,et al.  The Bridging and Bonding Role of Online Communities , 2002 .

[32]  J. Carey Communication As Culture , 1988 .

[33]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog , 2005, LinkKDD '05.

[34]  Kiley A. Larson The social construction of the Internet: A rural perspective , 2007 .

[35]  J. Horrigan Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties , 2001 .

[36]  Leo Marx,et al.  The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America by Leo Marx (review) , 1965 .

[37]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network , 2007, CHI.

[38]  F. Guillory Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society , 2010 .