The transition of energy intensive processing industries towards deep decarbonization : characteristics and implications for future research

Energy-intensive processing industries (EPIs) produce iron and steel, aluminum, chemicals, cement, glass, and paper and pulp and are responsible for a large share of global greenhouse gas emissions. To meet 2050 emission targets, an accelerated transition towards deep decarbonization is required in these industries. Insights from sociotechnical and innovation systems perspectives are needed to better understand how to steer and facilitate this transition process. The transitions literature has so far, however, not featured EPIs. This paper positions EPIs within the transitions literature by characterizing their sociotechnical and innovation systems in terms of industry structure, innovation strategies, networks, markets and governmental interventions. We subsequently explore how these characteristics may influence the transition to deep decarbonization and identify gaps in the literature from which we formulate an agenda for further transitions research on EPIs and consider policy implications. Furthering this research field would not only enrich discussions on policy for achieving deep decarbonization, but would also develop transitions theory since the distinctive EPI characteristics are likely to yield new patterns in transition dynamics.

[1]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Contestation, contingency, and justice in the Nordic low-carbon energy transition , 2017, Energy Policy.

[2]  Alexandra Mallett,et al.  Barriers to industrial energy efficiency: a literature review , 2011 .

[3]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? , 2011 .

[4]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation , 2009, Renewable Energy.

[5]  Johan Riesbeck,et al.  Biomass applications in iron and steel industry: An overview of challenges and opportunities , 2016 .

[6]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy , 2009 .

[7]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: An assessment of differences and pitfalls , 2007 .

[8]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[9]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  Slow technologies and government intervention: Energy efficiency in industrial process technologies , 2006 .

[10]  Alexandre Lucchesi,et al.  THE ENTREPRENEURIAL STATE: DEBUNKING PRIVATE VS PUBLIC SECTOR MYTHS , 2017 .

[11]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions , 2012 .

[12]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[13]  Esther Elisabeth Maria Luiten,et al.  Beyond energy efficiency : actors, networks and government intervention in the development of industrial process technologies , 2001 .

[14]  Alexander Tuebke,et al.  The 2010 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard , 2010 .

[15]  Frank Biermann,et al.  Conclusion: partnerships for sustainability - reflections on a future research agenda , 2006 .

[16]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries , 2017 .

[17]  Jesse D. Jenkins,et al.  A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: what do they tell us about feasibility? , 2015 .

[18]  Joeri H. Wesseling,et al.  Lock-in of mature innovation systems, The transformation toward clean concrete in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[19]  R. Kemp,et al.  Assessing the Dutch Energy Transition Policy: How Does it Deal with Dilemmas of Managing Transitions? , 2007 .

[20]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Decarbonising industry in Sweden an assessment of possibilities and policy needs , 2012 .

[21]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Planning versus implementation of energy-saving projects by industrial companies. Insights from the Dutch Long-Term Agreements , 2016 .

[22]  Masaru Yarime,et al.  From end-of-pipe technology to clean technology : effects of environmental regulation on technological change in the chlor-alkali industry in Japan and Western Europe , 2003 .

[23]  Eliseo Monfort,et al.  The green factor in European manufacturing: a case study of the Spanish ceramic tile industry , 2014 .

[24]  S. Oster,et al.  The diffusion of innovation among steel firms: the basic oxygen furnace , 1982 .

[25]  Christian Stenqvist,et al.  Pulp and Paper Industry , 2016 .

[26]  J. J. Schep.  Experiences with an Oxygen‐Fired Container Glass Furnace with Silica Crown — 14 Years — a World Record? , 2009 .

[27]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Explaining regime destabilisation in the pulp and paper industry , 2012 .

[28]  N. Strachan,et al.  The critical role of the industrial sector in reaching long-term emission reduction, energy efficiency and renewable targets , 2016 .

[29]  Paul Crompton,et al.  Economies of scale in global iron-making , 2008 .

[30]  Daniel S. Weld.  Comparative Analysis , 1987, IJCAI.

[31]  D. Banister,et al.  Simulating early adoption of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainability , 2013 .

[32]  W. S. Miller,et al.  Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry , 2000 .

[33]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Creation? Innovation Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions , 2015 .

[34]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[35]  Clemens Schneider,et al.  Re-Industrialisation and Low-Carbon Economy—Can They Go Together? Results from Stakeholder-Based Scenarios for Energy-Intensive Industries in the German State of , 2015 .

[36]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Move over! Stock turnover, retrofit and industrial energy efficiency , 2005 .

[37]  George T. Haley,et al.  Subsidies to Chinese Industry: State Capitalism, Business Strategy, and Trade Policy , 2013 .

[38]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[39]  Nora. Wintour.  The glass industry: recent trends and changes in working conditions and employment relations , 2015 .

[40]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[41]  Ajay Gambhir,et al.  A review of the technologies, economics and policy instruments for decarbonising energy-intensive manufacturing industries , 2014 .

[42]  Christophe Rynikiewicz,et al.  The climate change challenge and transitions for radical changes in the European steel industry , 2008 .

[43]  Ann-Kristin Bergquist,et al.  Transition to greener pulp: regulation, industry responses and path dependency , 2015 .

[44]  Siegfried Bauer,et al.  Sustainable materials: With both eyes open , 2012 .

[45]  Ali Hasanbeigi,et al.  Alternative emerging ironmaking technologies for energy-efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction: A technical review , 2014 .

[46]  G. Spaargaren.  Sustainable Consumption: A Theoretical and Environmental Policy Perspective , 2003, The Ecological Modernisation Reader.

[47]  Harald Schoenberger,et al.  Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control in Large Industrial Installations on the Basis of Best Available Techniques - The Sevilla Process , 2009 .

[48]  Paul Ekins,et al.  Cost-effective decarbonization in the EU: an overview of policy suitability , 2017 .

[49]  Ulrich Dewald,et al.  Why more sustainable cements failed so far? Disruptive innovations and their barriers in a basic industry , 2016 .

[50]  K. Scrivener,et al.  Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry , 2018, Cement and Concrete Research.

[51]  Chris Bataille,et al.  Managing carbon-intensive materials in a decarbonizing world without a global price on carbon , 2016 .

[52]  Maria,et al.  Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Tanning of Hides and Skins: Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU:(Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) , 2013 .

[53]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems : a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars , 2011 .

[54]  Simon J. Bennett,et al.  From petrochemical complexes to biorefineries? The past and prospective co-evolution of liquid fuels and chemicals production in the UK , 2009 .

[55]  P. Wells,et al.  Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry , 2012 .

[56]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Government and Environmental Innovation in Europe and North America , 2002 .

[57]  Petra Wächter.  Transitions to sustainable development – new directions in the study of long term transformative change , 2012 .

[58]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[59]  F. Geels,et al.  The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014) , 2016 .

[60]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[61]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  A novel approach for barriers to industrial energy efficiency , 2013 .

[62]  Deger Saygin,et al.  Benchmarking the energy use of energy-intensive industries in industrialized and in developing countries , 2011 .

[63]  M. Hekkert,et al.  How competitive forces sustain electric vehicle development , 2014 .

[64]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[65]  G. Spaargaren,et al.  Food Practices in Transition - Changing Food Consumption, Retail and Production in the Age of Reflexive Modernity , 2012 .

[66]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Unpacking resource mobilisation by incumbents for biorefineries: the role of micro-level factors for technological innovation system weaknesses , 2017, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[67]  Fred Steward,et al.  Transformative innovation policy to meet the challenge of climate change: sociotechnical networks aligned with consumption and end-use as new transition arenas for a low-carbon society or green economy , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[68]  Liliana B. Andonova.  Public-Private Partnerships for the Earth: Politics and Patterns of Hybrid Authority in the Multilateral System , 2010, Global Environmental Politics.

[69]  Vera Zipperer,et al.  The Valley of Death, the Technology Pork Barrel, and Public Support for Large Demonstration Projects , 2016, Energy Policy.

[70]  Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla,et al.  A comprehensive review on energy efficient CO2 breakthrough technologies for sustainable green iron and steel manufacturing , 2015 .

[71]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Decarbonising industry in the EU - climate, trade and industrial policy strategies , 2015 .

[72]  J. D. Beer.  FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT IRON AND STEEL MAKING , 1998 .

[73]  Li Wang,et al.  A review of energy use and energy-efficient technologies for the iron and steel industry , 2017 .

[74]  Joeri Wesseling,et al.  Explaining variance in national electric vehicle policies , 2016 .

[75]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Managing the costs of CO2 abatement in the cement industry , 2017 .

[76]  Petra Winzer,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of innovative steel production technologies , 2014 .

[77]  Christian Stenqvist,et al.  The limited effect of EU emissions trading on corporate climate strategies: Comparison of a Swedish and a Norwegian pulp and paper company , 2013 .