Statistical sensitivity analysis and water quality

In this paper, concepts and methods of statistical sensitivity analysis (SA) of computer models are reviewed and discussed in relation to water quality analysis and modelling. The starting point of this approach is based on modelling the uncertainty of the computer code by probability distributions. Despite the fact that computer models are generally speaking non-stochastic, in the sense that if we rerun the code we get the same result, the stochastic approach turns out to be useful to understand how the input uncertainty is propagated through the computer code into the output uncertainty. We follow the standard approach to SA which is based on variance decomposition and consider three levels of SA. At the Orst or preliminary level, we discuss DOE and response surface methodologies in order to get a first estimate of the input influences on the model output. At the second level, going further into modelling the relationship between computer model inputs and outputs, we assume that different computer runs are independent. We then discuss techniques derived from Monte Carlo input simulations and regression analysis. At the third level, recognizing that, since the computer model is actually non-stochastic, the errors are often smoother than independent errors, we consider the geostatistical SA which is based on assuming that the error of the computer code emulator is a stochastic process with positive correlation which gets higher as two inputs get closer.

[1]  Howard S. Wheater,et al.  Calibration of an in-river phosphorus model: prior evaluation of data needs and model uncertainty , 2004 .

[2]  P. Perri Sensitivity analysis , 2001, UN Vehicle Regulations for Road Safety Cost-benefit Methodology.

[3]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[4]  Y. C. Wang,et al.  An overview of numerical modelling of the Sydney deepwater outfall plumes , 1996 .

[5]  Rob Jamieson,et al.  Assessing microbial pollution of rural surface waters: A review of current watershed scale modeling approaches , 2004 .

[6]  Andrea P. Reverberi,et al.  Statistical sensitivity analysis of packed column reactors for contaminated wastewater , 2003 .

[7]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained with random and Latin hypercube sampling , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis , 2009 .

[9]  C. Reynolds Modelling phytoplankton dynamics and its application to lake management , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[10]  D. Huntington,et al.  Improvements to and limitations of Latin hypercube sampling , 1998 .

[11]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[12]  Lachlan T. H. Newham,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of a network-based, catchment-scale water-quality model , 2004 .

[13]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[14]  M. Stein Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling , 1987 .

[15]  Sidney Addelman,et al.  trans-Dimethanolbis(1,1,1-trifluoro-5,5-dimethylhexane-2,4-dionato)zinc(II) , 2008, Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online.

[16]  Alessandro Fasso,et al.  Space-Time Integration of Heterogeneous Networks in Air Quality Monitoring , 2004 .

[17]  G. Olyphant,et al.  Elements of a Predictive Model for Determining Beach Closures on a Real Time Basis: The Case of 63rd Street Beach Chicago , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[18]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. , 1979 .

[19]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[20]  Karen A. F. Copeland Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization , 2002 .

[21]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[22]  Paul Whitehead,et al.  Quality simulation along river systems (QUASAR): model theory and development , 1997 .

[23]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[24]  P. Whitehead,et al.  Calibration and sensitivity analysis of a river water quality model under unsteady flow conditions , 2003 .

[25]  M. Aitken,et al.  Predicting the effect of livestock inputs of E. coli on microbiological compliance of bathing waters. , 2004, Water research.

[26]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Variance‐Based Methods , 2008 .