The acquisition of auxiliaries BE and HAVE: an elicitation study*

Auxiliary syntax is recognized to be one of the more complex aspects of language that children must acquire. However, there is much disagreement among researchers concerning children's early understanding of auxiliaries, with some researchers advocating a relatively abstract grammar as the basis for auxiliary syntax, while others view the acquisition of auxiliary syntax as the gradual accumulation of linguistic knowledge, initially tied to individual lexical items. To investigate the status of children's early knowledge of auxiliary syntax, two studies were carried out. In study 1, 28 children (M=3;1) were tested for their use of the auxiliaries BE and HAVE in declaratives, while in study 2, 19 children (M=3;3) were tested for their use of these auxiliaries in questions. Although overall error rates were low, there were differences between BE and HAVE in the proportion and types of errors observed in declaratives and questions, and some individual children showed very high error rates. The implications of these findings for different models of auxiliary syntax in children's early utterances are discussed.

[1]  J. Shaffer Multiple Hypothesis Testing , 1995 .

[2]  M L Rice,et al.  Tense over time: the longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  J. Pine,et al.  Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category , 1998 .

[4]  K. Stromswold Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries , 1990 .

[5]  James R. Hurford,et al.  A child and the English question formation rule , 1975, Journal of Child Language.

[6]  Diane Frome Loeb,et al.  An evaluation of the facilitative effects of inverted yes-no questions on the acquisition of auxiliary verbs. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  Brian Richards,et al.  Language Development and Individual Differences: A Study of Auxiliary Verb Learning , 1990 .

[8]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: BE and HAVE , 2005 .

[9]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don't in English , 1999 .

[10]  Ewa Dabrowska,et al.  From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions , 2001 .

[11]  R. Langacker Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[12]  M L Rice,et al.  An examination of the morpheme BE in children with specific language impairment: the role of contractibility and grammatical form class. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of the input in the acquisition of third person singular verbs in English. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. , 2001, Journal of child language.

[15]  B. Lust,et al.  Continuity and development in the acquisition of inversion in yes/no questions: dissociating movement and inflection , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[17]  M. Tomasello,et al.  A tale of two theories: response to Fisher , 2002, Cognition.

[18]  Paul Fletcher,et al.  A Child's Learning of English , 1985 .

[19]  M L Rice,et al.  Specific language impairment as a period of extended optional infinitive. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[21]  Stephen Wilson Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[23]  S. Kuczaj,et al.  Against the transformationalist account: a simpler analysis of auxiliary overmarkings , 1978, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  C. Johnson,et al.  The emergence of present perfect verb forms: semantic influences on selective imitation , 1985, Journal of Child Language.

[25]  M. Tomasello Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[26]  V. Gathercole,et al.  The acquisition of the present perfect: explaining differences in the speech of Scottish and American children , 1986, Journal of Child Language.

[27]  M. Tomasello First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[28]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’ , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[29]  Jane B. Childers,et al.  The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[30]  J. Pine,et al.  Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’ , 2000, Journal of Child Language.