The control of stem cell morphology and differentiation by hydrogel surface wrinkles.

In this study, we investigated human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) interactions with uniform hydrogels and hydrogels with lamellar or hexagonal surface wrinkles to elucidate our ability to control hMSC morphology and differentiation. Wrinkled hydrogels were prepared from photocurable poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) precursor solutions containing ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as a crosslinker, using depth-wise gradients in crosslinking and subsequent buckling with swelling to generate wrinkles. A replica molding process was used to fabricate a series of gels with uniform mechanics, but altered surface wrinkle size and shape. We found that hMSCs attached to lamellar wrinkles spread by taking the shape of the pattern, exhibit high aspect ratios, and differentiate into an osteogenic lineage. In contrast, cells that attached inside the hexagonal patterns remain rounded with low spreading and differentiate into an adipogenic lineage. This work aids in the development of material-based cell culture and scaffold systems to direct stem cell differentiation.

[1]  K. Dawson,et al.  Interaction of soft condensed materials with living cells: Phenotype/transcriptome correlations for the hydrophobic effect , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Boettiger,et al.  Modulation of cell proliferation and differentiation through substrate-dependent changes in fibronectin conformation. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  J. Aubin,et al.  Differentiation of muscle, fat, cartilage, and bone from progenitor cells present in a bone-derived clonal cell population: effect of dexamethasone , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J. Burdick,et al.  Swelling‐Induced Surface Patterns in Hydrogels with Gradient Crosslinking Density , 2009 .

[6]  V. Sikavitsas,et al.  Biomaterials and bone mechanotransduction. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[7]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Controlling Stem Cell Fate with Material Design , 2010, Advanced materials.

[8]  G. Sukhikh,et al.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2002, Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[9]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[10]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Emergence of Patterned Stem Cell Differentiation Within Multicellular Structures , 2008, Stem cells.

[11]  M. Pittenger,et al.  Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. , 1999, Science.

[12]  B. Spiegelman,et al.  Fibronectin modulation of cell shape and lipogenic gene expression in 3t3-adipocytes , 1983, Cell.

[13]  Benjamin G. Keselowsky,et al.  Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  J. Burdick,et al.  Kinetic study of swelling-induced surface pattern formation and ordering in hydrogel films with depth-wise crosslinking gradient , 2010 .

[15]  A. M. Parfitt,et al.  Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: Cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[16]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[17]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[18]  G. Vunjak‐Novakovic,et al.  Engineered microenvironments for controlled stem cell differentiation. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[19]  Hiroyuki Miyoshi,et al.  The Role of Stromal Stem Cells in Tissue Regeneration and Wound Repair , 2009, Science.

[20]  J. Burdick,et al.  Influence of three-dimensional hyaluronic acid microenvironments on mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[21]  Kevin E. Healy,et al.  Engineering gene expression and protein synthesis by modulation of nuclear shape , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[23]  H. Sul,et al.  Understanding adipocyte differentiation. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[24]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[26]  D. Grainger,et al.  Modulating fibroblast adhesion, spreading, and proliferation using self-assembled monolayer films of alkylthiolates on gold. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[27]  R. Composto,et al.  Topographic guidance of endothelial cells on silicone surfaces with micro- to nanogrooves: orientation of actin filaments and focal adhesions. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[28]  Jason A. Burdick,et al.  Sequential crosslinking to control cellular spreading in 3-dimensional hydrogels , 2009 .

[29]  H. Shimizu,et al.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells Are Recruited into Wounded Skin and Contribute to Wound Repair by Transdifferentiation into Multiple Skin Cell Type1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  J M Anderson,et al.  Influence of biomaterial surface chemistry on the apoptosis of adherent cells. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[31]  L. Gerstenfeld,et al.  Osteoblasts induce osteopontin expression in response to attachment on fibronectin: Demonstration of a common role for integrin receptors in the signal transduction processes of cell attachment and mechanical stimulation , 1998, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[32]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.