The Teamwork Process Antecedents (TPA) questionnaire: developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing antecedents of teamwork process quality

Context Most models of teamwork describe team behavior and effectiveness using an Input-Process-Output approach. In software engineering, the use of such models has focused on understanding and operationalizing the Process-Output components while less research effort has been applied to define and measure the Input-Process component. Objective To develop and validate a measure of teamwork process antecedents (inputs) that addresses specific characteristics of software teams in industrial practice. Method First, we reviewed the group work literature, identified and integrated previously described antecedents of work group process, and developed a measure to tap those antecedents. This measure is operationalized in the Teamwork Process Antecedents (TPA) questionnaire, which we then validated with 375 Brazilian software engineers from 100 companies, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results We created a survey to operationalize two multidimensional antecedents of teamwork process, Team Structure and Team Composition, based on well-established models from the literature on work teams. We tailored the response items to the software engineering context to increase construct face validity. We reached a parsimonious set of five dimensions for Team Composition (16 response items) and four dimensions for Team Structure (11 response items). Our results show that our measure of TPA has excellent internal reliability and convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusions We created a novel measure of antecedents of teamwork process tailored to software teams, that captures the perception of team members about the adequacy of team composition and structure to achieve team goals. Further, we present the development of the TPA measure in the form of a guideline that may be used in the construction of other measurement instruments in empirical software engineering research. We believe both results are important contributions of this work.

[1]  Jay B. Carson,et al.  Internal Team Leadership: An Examination of Leadership Roles, Role Structure, and Member Outcomes , 2006 .

[2]  T. Thrall.  Work redesign. , 2003, Hospitals & health networks.

[3]  S. Câmara,et al.  Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS , 2011 .

[4]  M. Hoegl,et al.  TEAM GOAL COMMITMENT IN INNOVATIVE PROJECTS , 2006 .

[5]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[6]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[7]  Darren George,et al.  SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference , 1998 .

[8]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managers’ Work Experience, Ambidexterity, and Performance: The Contingency Role of the Work Context , 2015 .

[9]  I. Brace,et al.  Questionnaire Design: How to Plan, Structure and Write Survey Material for Effective Market Research , 2004 .

[10]  Nancy P. Rothbard,et al.  Unpacking Prior Experience: How Career History Affects Job Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Phil Wood.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2008 .

[12]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis , 2014 .

[13]  Shari Lawrence Pfleeger,et al.  Principles of survey research: part 5: populations and samples , 2002, SOEN.

[14]  Cherng G. Ding,et al.  Exploring team performance in high-tech industries: Future trends of building up teamwork , 2015 .

[15]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  JOB AND TEAM DESIGN , 2006, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics.

[16]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[17]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[18]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[19]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  DESIGNING EFFECTIVE SELF-MANAGING WORK TEAMS , 1993 .

[20]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Autonomy and teamwork in innovative projects , 2006 .

[21]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[22]  Tore Dybå,et al.  A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[23]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[24]  V. Wickramasinghe,et al.  Diversity in team composition, relationship conflict and team leader support on globally distributed virtual software development team performance , 2015 .

[25]  Andreas M. Brandmaier,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling With Ωnyx , 2015 .

[26]  Hazlinda Hassan,et al.  Role of team size as a contextual variable for the relationship of transformational leadership and teamwork quality , 2018 .

[27]  Adel M. Aladwani.  An Integrated Performance Model of Information Systems Projects , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  R. Bagozzi.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment , 1981 .

[29]  J. Marôco.  Análise de Equações Estruturais: Fundamentos Teóricos, Software e Aplicações , 2010 .

[30]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects , 2004 .

[31]  E. Salas,et al.  Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. , 1992 .

[32]  X. Koufteros.  Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling , 1999 .

[33]  J. Ludbrook.  Should we use one‐sided or two‐sided P values in tests of significance? , 2013, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[34]  Li-Ren Yang,et al.  The association among project manager's leadership style, teamwork and project success , 2011 .

[35]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations: Review Update , 2013 .

[36]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[37]  Dianne Hall,et al.  Information technology and knowledge in software development teams: The role of project uncertainty , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[38]  K. Bezrukova,et al.  A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance , 2004 .

[39]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Torgeir Dingsøyr,et al.  Agile Process Improvement: Diagnosis and Planning to Improve Teamwork , 2011, EuroSPI.

[41]  Weidong Xia,et al.  Toward Agile: An Integrated Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Field Data , 2010, MIS Q..

[42]  Thomas Schmid,et al.  Do As You Want Or Do As You Are Told? Control vs. Autonomy in Agile Software Development Teams , 2018, HICSS.

[43]  Bruno Figueiredo Damásio.  Uso da análise fatorial exploratória em psicologia , 2012 .

[44]  Martin Hoegl,et al.  Smaller teams–better teamwork: How to keep project teams small , 2005 .

[45]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[46]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Relating Collaborative Technology Use to Teamwork Quality and Performance: An Empirical Analysis , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  R. Cattell.  The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences , 2012 .

[48]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[49]  Hans-Georg Wolff,et al.  Exploring item and higher order factor structure with the Schmid-Leiman solution: Syntax codes for SPSS and SAS , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[50]  Fabio Q. B. da Silva,et al.  Team Maturity in Software Engineering Teams , 2017, 2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM).

[51]  D. Mitrany.  Methodology of the Social Sciences , 1945, Nature.

[52]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Implications of Strategy and Social Context for the Relationship Between Top , 2002 .

[53]  Tenko Raykov,et al.  Scale construction and development using structural equation modeling. , 2012 .

[54]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of teamwork quality in new product development projects , 2009 .

[55]  D. Watson,et al.  Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development , 1995 .

[56]  F. Morgeson.  The external leadership of self-managing teams: intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  SPECIFICATION SEARCHES IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING , 1986 .

[58]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[59]  J. McGrath.  Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[60]  Dalson Britto Figueiredo Filho,et al.  Visão além do alcance: uma introdução à análise fatorial , 2010 .

[61]  M. Browne,et al.  Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[62]  M. Hoegl,et al.  When teamwork really matters: task innovativeness as a moderator of the teamwork–performance relationship in software development projects , 2003 .

[63]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[64]  R. Mcintyre,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Teamwork Measurement , 1997 .

[65]  Dana E. Sims,et al.  Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? , 2005 .

[66]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Fostering team effectiveness in organizations: toward an integrative theoretical framework. , 2007, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[67]  Nils Brede Moe,et al.  Exploring Norms in Agile Software Teams , 2016, PROFES.

[68]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise , 1997 .

[69]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team Reflexivity in Innovative Projects , 2006 .

[70]  Fabio Q. B. da Silva,et al.  Team Maturity in Software Engineering Teams: A Work in Progress , 2017, 2017 IEEE/ACM 10th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE).

[71]  G. Spreitzer.  PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .