Big data analytics and firm performance: Findings from a mixed-method approach

Abstract Big data analytics has been widely regarded as a breakthrough technological development in academic and business communities. Despite the growing number of firms that are launching big data initiatives, there is still limited understanding on how firms translate the potential of such technologies into business value. The literature argues that to leverage big data analytics and realize performance gains, firms must develop strong big data analytics capabilities. Nevertheless, most studies operate under the assumption that there is limited heterogeneity in the way firms build their big data analytics capabilities and that related resources are of similar importance regardless of context. This paper draws on complexity theory and investigates the configurations of resources and contextual factors that lead to performance gains from big data analytics investments. Our empirical investigation followed a mixed methods approach using survey data from 175 chief information officers and IT managers working in Greek firms, and three case studies to show that depending on the context, big data analytics resources differ in significance when considering performance gains. Applying a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method on the quantitative data, we show that there are four different patterns of elements surrounding big data analytics that lead to high performance. Outcomes of the three case studies highlight the inter-relationships between these elements and outline challenges that organizations face when orchestrating big data analytics resources.

[1]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Charles Ragin's Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) used for linguistic summarizations , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[2]  L. Stern,et al.  Conducting Interorganizational Research Using Key Informants , 1993 .

[3]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[4]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA , 2017 .

[5]  Ioanna D. Constantiou,et al.  New games, new rules: big data and the changing context of strategy , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Andrew M. Farrell,et al.  Insufficient Discriminant Validity: A Comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty and Shiu (2009) , 2008 .

[7]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods , 2017 .

[8]  A. Woodside.  Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory , 2013 .

[9]  Peer C. Fiss.  A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[10]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  J. Edwards.  Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[12]  Rik Maes,et al.  International Journal of Information Management on the Governance of Information: Introducing a New Concept of Governance to Support the Management of Information , 2022 .

[13]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment , 2001, MIS Q..

[14]  Leroy White,et al.  A Cook's tour: Towards a framework for measuring the social impact of social purpose organisations , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  In the company of givers and takers. , 2013, Harvard business review.

[17]  S. Fawcett,et al.  Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform Supply Chain Design and Management , 2013 .

[18]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[20]  J. Manyika.  Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity , 2011 .

[21]  Paul P. Tallon,et al.  The Information Artifact in IT Governance: Toward a Theory of Information Governance , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets (fsQCA) , 2008 .

[24]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach , 2016 .

[25]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Big data analytics in logistics and supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications , 2016 .

[26]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[27]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[28]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Transforming Decision-Making Processes Transforming decision-making processes : a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organizations , 2017 .

[29]  Joey F. George,et al.  Toward the development of a big data analytics capability , 2016, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Rana Tassabehji,et al.  The impact of big data analytics on firms’ high value business performance , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[31]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations , 2014 .

[32]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  Developing a business analytics methodology: A case study in the foodbank sector , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Animation on Information Seeking Performance on the World Wide Web: Securing Attention or Interfering with Primary Tasks? , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[34]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[35]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets , 2010 .

[36]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  When the Recipe Is More Important Than the Ingredients , 2014 .

[37]  P CachonGérard,et al.  Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999 .

[38]  Sam Ransbotham,et al.  Beyond the hype: The hard work behind analytics success , 2016 .

[39]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  The Role of Business Intelligence and Communication Technologies in Organizational Agility: A Configurational Approach , 2017, Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

[40]  Jan Recker,et al.  Ten principles of good business process management , 2014, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[41]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[42]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[43]  Richard Vidgen,et al.  Management challenges in creating value from business analytics , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Viju Raghupathi,et al.  Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential , 2014, Health Information Science and Systems.

[45]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Big data: the management revolution. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[47]  C. L. Philip Chen,et al.  Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[48]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[49]  D. Ribeiro-Soriano,et al.  Firm survival: The role of incubators and business characteristics , 2015 .

[50]  Laura Cabrera,et al.  Applying systems thinking models of organizational design and change in community operational research , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Carmen Llinares,et al.  Exploring the relationship between co-creation and satisfaction using QCA , 2016 .

[52]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Embrace•perform•model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities , 2014 .

[53]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda , 2017, Information Systems and e-Business Management.

[54]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[55]  Arun Rai,et al.  Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities , 2017 .

[57]  Antonio J. Verdú,et al.  The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between real options and technological innovation in high-tech firms , 2012 .

[58]  Marleen Huysman,et al.  Debating big data: A literature review on realizing value from big data , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  A contingency model for estimating success of strategic information systems planning , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[60]  Paul P. Tallon.  Corporate Governance of Big Data: Perspectives on Value, Risk, and Cost , 2013, Computer.

[61]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies , 2018, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[62]  Roger H. L. Chiang,et al.  Big Data Research in Information Systems: Toward an Inclusive Research Agenda , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Proposing a new logic for data analysis in marketing and consumer behavior: case study research of large-N survey data for estimating algorithms that accurately profile X (extremely high-use) consumers , 2012 .

[64]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Innovation: The Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities and Moderating Effect of the Environment , 2019, British Journal of Management.

[65]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems , 2013, MIS Q..