Comparative study of drivers of and barriers to relational transactions faced by public clients, private contractors and consultants in public projects

Relational transactions can bring about good project outcomes. However, public projects in which different parties hold differential attitudes toward the adoption of relational transactions would likely encounter more uncertainties which may affect the implementation of such relational transactions. This paper aims to compare different parties' (i.e., clients, contractors and consultants) perceptions of the factors motivating and deterring relational transactions in public projects. The results of a questionnaire survey of 104 public projects in Singapore show that 21 drivers could significantly motivate each party to adopt relational transactions; and three parties' perceptions of the importance of the drivers are not significantly different. The topmost driver for each party to adopt relational transactions is the aim of achieving safety performance. The results also show that: (i) the three parties regarded public sector accountability, bureaucracy and stringent rules, regulations and laws as the most serious barriers; (ii) the biggest challenge to adopting relational transactions stems from the public sector client, followed by private sector consultants; and (iii) contractors face the least number of barriers. The measures to ameliorate the barriers to relational transactions are recommended.

[1]  D. Jones,et al.  PROCUREMENT PRACTICES IN THE SINGAPORE CIVIL SERVICE: BALANCING CONTROL AND DELEGATION , 2002 .

[2]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Client perceptions of barriers to partnering , 2008 .

[3]  Charles R. Glagola,et al.  Partnering on Defense Contracts , 2002 .

[4]  Akintola Akintoye,et al.  An analysis of success factors and benefits of partnering in construction , 2000 .

[5]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Owner Goals for Design/Build Projects , 2008 .

[6]  G. Edward Gibson,et al.  Partnering-Project Performance in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers , 1993 .

[7]  Mike Bresnen,et al.  Building partnerships: case studies of clientcontractor collaboration in the UK construction industry , 2000 .

[8]  John A. Drexler,et al.  PARTNERING: WHY PROJECT OWNER-CONTRACTOR RELATIONSHIPS CHANGE , 2000 .

[9]  A. Kadefors.  Trust in project relationships-inside the black box , 2004 .

[10]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Procurement effects on trust and control in client-contractor relationships , 2007 .

[11]  Michael Y. Mak,et al.  Problematic issues associated with project partnering — the contractor perspective , 2002 .

[12]  Erik Larson,et al.  Project Partnering: Results of Study of 280 Construction Projects , 1995 .

[13]  Yoki M. W. Wong,et al.  Factors influencing the success of PPP at feasibility stage – A tripartite comparison study in Hong Kong , 2012 .

[14]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Achieving Partnering Success through an Incentive Agreement: Lessons Learned from an Underground Railway Extension Project in Hong Kong , 2008 .

[15]  Donn E. Hancher,et al.  Partnering: Contracting for the Future , 1990 .

[16]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Effects of interpersonal relations on public sector construction contracts in Vietnam , 2012 .

[17]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  Overcoming Network Overload and Redundancy in Interorganizational Networks: The Roles of Potential and Latent Ties , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Constructing Relationally Integrated Teams , 2005 .

[19]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Improved subcontractor selection employing partnering principles , 2000 .

[20]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Quality self-control and co-supervision mechanism of construction agent in public investment project in China , 2012 .

[21]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Contracting Relationship Trends and Transitions , 2004 .

[22]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Co-operative benchmarking: a tool for partnering excellence in construction , 2001 .

[23]  F. Ling,et al.  Public construction project delivery process in Singapore, Beijing, Hong Kong and Sydney , 2013 .

[24]  Anna Kadefors,et al.  Editorial: establishing collaboration in public engineering projects , 2012 .

[25]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  A model for supporting inter-organizational relations in the supply chain , 2002 .

[26]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Supply strategy and network effects — purchasing behaviour in the construction industry , 2000 .

[27]  Larry G. Crowley,et al.  Conceptual Model of Partnering , 1995 .

[28]  Danny C. K. Ho,et al.  Effect of Interorganizational Teamwork on Project Outcome , 2001 .

[29]  Hong Yan,et al.  An empirical study on incentives of strategic partnering in China: Views from construction companies , 2007 .

[30]  M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Benchmarking contractor selection practices in public‐sector construction—a proposed model , 2000 .

[31]  A. Akintoye,et al.  Collaborative relationships in construction: the UK contractors' perception , 2007 .

[32]  A. Akintoye,et al.  A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the UK construction industry , 2000 .

[33]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[34]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Partnering in Construction: Critical Study of Problems for Implementation , 2003 .

[35]  Anna Kadefors,et al.  Collaboration in public construction—contractual incentives, partnering schemes and trust , 2012 .

[36]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Relational Contracting and Teambuilding: Assessing Potential Contractual and Noncontractual Incentives , 2008 .

[37]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  An empirical study of the benefits of construction partnering in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[38]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Potential for Implementing Relational Contracting and Joint Risk Management , 2004 .

[39]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Incorporating Contractual Incentives to Facilitate Relational Contracting , 2006 .

[40]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Nasty, Brutish, and Short: Embeddedness Failure in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2010 .

[41]  Michael Murray,et al.  Construction procurement : redefining the contours of organizational structures in procurement , 2001 .

[42]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Conflict or consensus: An investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong , 2012 .

[43]  E. Radziszewska-Zielina.  Analysis of the Impact of the Level of Partnering Relations on the Selected Indexes of Success of Polish Construction Enterprises , 2010 .