A systematic review of viewing conditions and monitor specifications in mammography.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this systematic review was to establish the current status of recommended monitor specifications and viewing conditions in mammography for image acquisition and reporting rooms. A literature search was completed between August 2018 and March 2019 using ScienceDirect, PubMed, Web of Science and MEDLINE databases. An additional manual search was performed to identify relevant guidelines to support the review. Only articles and guidelines written in English were included. KEY FINDINGS Results were selected according to the following criteria; articles detailing (i) monitor specification and, (ii) viewing conditions in mammography acquisition and reporting rooms. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Six papers described monitor specifications, five described viewing conditions and ten guideline documents were identified from the UK, Europe and the US. Common outcomes were that monitors with 3 or 5 MP resolution seemed to be preferred and at the same time higher illumination levels (>15 lux) were found to decrease the luminance of the monitors and negatively impact the assessment of image quality. Contrary to this, the majority of guideline documents recommended illumination levels above 20 Lux. Finally, there is a lack of guidance for viewing conditions in acquisition rooms. CONCLUSION This review did not reveal any strong evidence for the proposed room illumination levels in acquisition rooms. In reference to monitors specifications, there is preference for using higher resolution displays (3 and 5 MP) but again, the evidence is not strong. Moreover, variance exists in the guidelines and that promotes inconsistency in mammography departments. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This review highlights the lack of standardised guidelines and the need for further research on the viewing conditions and monitor specifications for the acquisition rooms in mammography.

[1]  J. A. Thomas,et al.  Effect of Room Illuminance on Monitor Black Level Luminance and Monitor Calibration , 2003, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Digital mammography image quality: image display. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[3]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[4]  Rob Aspin,et al.  Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance. , 2017, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  C. Styles,et al.  Comparison of 3MP medical‐grade to 1MP office‐grade LCD monitors in mammographic diagnostic and perceptual performance , 2011, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[6]  Benjamin J. Pollard,et al.  Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions. , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  The influence of increased ambient lighting on mass detection in mammograms. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[8]  Yubo Fan,et al.  Biomimetic delivery of signals for bone tissue engineering , 2018, Bone Research.

[9]  P. Brennan,et al.  Ambient Light Levels for Radiological Soft Copy Viewing: A Multi-Site Comparison , 2007 .

[10]  Alastair G. Gale,et al.  The use of lower resolution viewing devices for mammographic interpretation: implications for education and training , 2015, European Radiology.

[11]  E. Tacconelli Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[12]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. , 2005, Medical physics.

[13]  João M. F. Rodrigues,et al.  Detection of Indoor and Outdoor Stairs , 2013, IbPRIA.

[14]  D S Brettle Display considerations for hospital-wide viewing of soft copy images. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Reduced Specificity of Autobiographical Memory and Depression , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.