An economic decision-making support system for selection of reproductive management programs on dairy farms.

Because the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows influences the profitability of dairy operations, predicting the future reproductive and economic performance of dairy herds through decision support systems would be valuable to dairy producers and consultants. In this study, we present a highly adaptable tool created based on a mathematical model combining Markov chain simulation with partial budgeting to obtain the net present value (NPV; $/cow per year) of different reproductive management programs. The growing complexity of reproductive programs used by dairy farms demands that new decision support systems precisely reflect the events that occur on the farm. Therefore, the model requires productive, reproductive, and economic input data used for simulation of farm conditions to account for all factors related to reproductive management that increase costs and generate revenue. The economic performance of 3 different reproductive programs can be simultaneously compared with the current model. A program utilizing 100% visual estrous detection (ED) for artificial insemination (AI) is used as a baseline for comparison with 2 other programs that may include 100% timed AI (TAI) as well as any combination of TAI and ED. A case study is presented in which the model was used to compare 3 different reproductive management strategies (100% ED baseline compared with two 100% TAI options) using data from a commercial farm in Wisconsin. Sensitivity analysis was then used to assess the effect of varying specific reproductive parameters on the NPV. Under the simulated conditions of the case study, the model indicated that the two 100% TAI programs were superior to the 100% ED program and, of the 100% TAI programs, the one with the higher conception rate (CR) for resynchronized AI services was economically superior despite having higher costs and a longer interbreeding interval. A 4% increase in CR for resynchronized AI was sufficient for the inferior 100% TAI to outperform the superior program. Adding ED to the 100% TAI programs was only beneficial for the program with the lower CR. The improvement in service rate required for the 100% ED program to have the same NPV as the superior 100% TAI program was 12%. The decision support system developed in this study is a valuable tool that may be used to assist dairy producers and industry consultants in selecting the best farm-specific reproductive management strategy.

[1]  T R Bilby,et al.  Strategies for improving fertility in the modern dairy cow. , 2006, Theriogenology.

[2]  Y. Chang,et al.  An observational analysis of twin births, calf sex ratio, and calf mortality in Holstein dairy cattle. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  C. Risco,et al.  Economic comparison of natural service and timed artificial insemination breeding programs in dairy cattle. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  A. Heinrichs,et al.  Dairy operation management practices and herd milk production. , 1996, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  D T Galligan,et al.  An economic spreadsheet model to determine optimal breeding and replacement decisions for dairy cattle. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[6]  J. E. Legates,et al.  Production Losses in Dairy Cattle Due to Days Open , 1968 .

[7]  E. Ezra,et al.  The Effect of Extended Calving Intervals in High Lactating Cows on Milk Production and Profitability , 2001 .

[8]  M. Wiltbank,et al.  Comparison of ovarian function and circulating steroids in estrous cycles of Holstein heifers and lactating cows. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows treated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and/or prostaglandin F2a (PGF2a) for synchronization of estrus and ovulation. , 1998, Theriogenology.

[10]  G. Frazer,et al.  A spreadsheet-based model demonstrating the nonuniform economic effects of varying reproductive performance in Ohio dairy herds. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  E. Ezra,et al.  The effect of extended calving intervals in high-yielding lactating cows on milk production and profitability. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  J. Dekkers,et al.  Estimation of economic values of indices for reproductive performance in dairy herds using computer simulation. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  J. Britt Enhanced reproduction and its economic implications. , 1985, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  R W Rorie,et al.  Application of electronic estrus detection technologies to reproductive management of cattle. , 2002, Theriogenology.

[15]  A De Vries,et al.  Economic value of pregnancy in dairy cattle. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  W. Heuwieser,et al.  Comparison of timed AI after synchronized ovulation to AI at estrus: reproductive and economic considerations. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  K. Weigel,et al.  Survey of management practices on reproductive performance of dairy cattle on large US commercial farms. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  M. Wiltbank,et al.  Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2α and GnRH , 1995 .

[19]  R Vishwanath,et al.  Estrus detection using radiotelemetry or visual observation and tail painting for dairy cows on pasture. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  K. Weigel,et al.  Management practices associated with conception rate and service rate of lactating Holstein cows in large, commercial dairy herds. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  P. Fricke,et al.  Effect of interval from timed artificial insemination to initiation of resynchronization of ovulation on fertility of lactating dairy cows. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  M. Wiltbank,et al.  Increased fertility in lactating dairy cows resynchronized with Double-Ovsynch compared with Ovsynch initiated 32 d after timed artificial insemination. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  J. Santos,et al.  The effect of embryonic death rates in cattle on the efficacy of estrus synchronization programs. , 2004, Animal reproduction science.

[24]  Y. Folman,et al.  Reproductive management of dairy cattle based on synchronization of estrous cycles. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  C A Wolf,et al.  Stochastic economic analysis of dairy cattle artificial insemination reproductive management programs. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  M. Wiltbank,et al.  A new presynchronization system (Double-Ovsynch) increases fertility at first postpartum timed AI in lactating dairy cows. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[27]  M. Thurmond,et al.  A surveillance system for bovine abortion. , 1990 .

[28]  C. Shumway,et al.  Economic Value of Days Open for Holstein Cows of Alternative Milk Yields with Varying Calving Intervals , 1984 .

[29]  C. Risco,et al.  Effects of presynchronization and bovine somatotropin on pregnancy rates to a timed artificial insemination protocol in lactating dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  J. T. Green,et al.  Milk production and economic measures in confinement or pasture systems using seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  W. Thatcher,et al.  Effects of resynchronization programs on pregnancy per artificial insemination, progesterone, and pregnancy-associated glycoproteins in plasma of lactating dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  Robert A. Milligan,et al.  Systems Analysis for Designing Reproductive Management Programs to Increase Production and Profit in Dairy Herds , 1981 .

[33]  A. De Vries Economics of delayed replacement when cow performance is seasonal. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[34]  J. S. Britt,et al.  Comparison of two estrus synchronization programs in a large, confinement-housed dairy herd. , 1998, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.