Cortical Magnification Neutralizes the Eccentricity Effect in Visual Search

We report two visual search experiments that explain an eccentricity effect previously found: detection of both feature and conjunction targets becomes increasingly less efficient as the orientation target appears at more distant field eccentricities (Carrasco et al., 1995). By cortically magnifying the stimuli we flattened out this effect for both feature and conjunction tasks. We conclude that spatial resolution factors affect visual search findings that have hitherto been attributed to covert attention. We stress the importance of analyzing data by target position to minimize the confound of the set size effect and retinal/field eccentricity. An alternative theory of orientation asymmetries is offered.

[1]  A Cohen,et al.  Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  J. Kerr,et al.  Visual resolution in the periphery , 1971 .

[3]  J. Townsend SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[4]  S. Appelle Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Cortical acuity and the luminous flux collected by retinal ganglion cells at various eccentricities in human rod and cone vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[6]  R. Ivry,et al.  Dissociation of short- and long-range apparent motion in visual search. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  J Saarinen,et al.  Perception of Positional Relationships between Line Segments in Eccentric Vision , 1987, Perception.

[8]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[10]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[11]  W. Geisler,et al.  Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search. , 1995, Psychological review.

[12]  J. Wolfe The Parallel Guidance of Visual Attention , 1992 .

[13]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Attention as a Cognitive and Neural System , 1992 .

[14]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual masking : an integrative approach , 1984 .

[16]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  K H Shum,et al.  Evidence for feature perturbations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  R A Kinchla,et al.  Precue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited? , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  J. Townsend Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[21]  R Näsänen,et al.  Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[23]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Stimulus discriminability in visual search , 1994, Vision Research.

[24]  J Rovamo,et al.  Texture discrimination at different eccentricities. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[26]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model , 1974 .

[27]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[28]  H. Egeth,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing in visual search: further evidence from subadditive effects of visual quality. , 1991 .

[29]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  D H Hubel,et al.  Brain mechanisms of vision. , 1979, Scientific American.

[31]  F. Kitterle Psychophysics of lateral tachistoscopic presentation , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[32]  A. Treisman Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[35]  J. Palmer Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.

[36]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Sensitivity To Three-Dimensional Orientation in Visual Search , 1990 .

[39]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  D. Sagi Detection of an orientation singularity in gabor textures: Effect of signal density and spatial-frequency , 1990, Vision Research.

[42]  B. Julesz,et al.  Short-range limitation on detection of feature differences. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[43]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[44]  C Bundesen,et al.  Color segregation and visual search , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  R. Ivry,et al.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[48]  H Pashler,et al.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  A Cohen Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Neural Basis of Orientation Perception in Primate Vision , 1974, Science.

[54]  F. Crick Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  R Klein,et al.  Search performance without eye movements , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Attention: Selection, Awareness, and Control , 1993 .

[57]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  SEarch via recursive rejection (SERR) , 1998 .

[58]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  A. Johnston,et al.  Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect , 1985, Vision Research.

[60]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  11 – FORM PERCEPTION AND ATTENTION: Striate Cortex and Beyond , 1990 .

[61]  A. Treisman Visual Attention and the Perception of Features and Objects , 1994 .

[62]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Perimetry of critical flicker frequency in human rod and cone vision , 1986, Vision Research.

[63]  H. Pashler Target-distractor discriminability in visual search , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.