Life cycle assessment of hydrotreated vegetable oil from rape, oil palm and Jatropha

A life cycle assessment of hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) biofuel was performed. The study was commissioned by Volvo Technology Corporation and Volvo Penta Corporation as part of an effort to gain a better understanding of the environmental impact of potential future biobased liquid fuels for cars and trucks. The life cycle includes production of vegetable oil from rape, oil palm or Jatropha, transport of the oil to the production site, production of the HVO from the oil, and combustion of the HVO. The functional unit of the study is 1 kWh energy out from the engine of a heavy-duty truck and the environmental impact categories that are considered are global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP) and embedded fossil production energy. System expansion was used to take into account byproducts from activities in the systems; this choice was made partly to make this study comparable to results reported by other studies. The results show that HVO produced from palm oil combined with energy production from biogas produced from the palm oil mill effluent has the lowest environmental impact of the feedstocks investigated in this report. HVO has a significantly lower life cycle GWP than conventional diesel oil for all feedstocks investigated, and a GWP that is comparable to results for e.g. rape methyl ester reported in the literature. The results show that emissions from soil caused by microbial activities and leakage are the largest contributors to most environmental impact categories, which is supported also by other studies. Nitrous oxide emissions from soil account for more than half of the GWP of HVO. Nitrogen oxides and ammonia emissions from soil cause almost all of the life cycle EP of HVO and contribute significantly to the AP as well. The embedded fossil production energy was shown to be similar to results for e.g. rape methyl ester from other studies. A sensitivity analysis shows that variations in crop yield and in nitrous oxide emissions from microbial activities in soil can cause significant changes to the results.

[1]  Gengqiang Pu,et al.  Life cycle inventory and energy analysis of cassava-based Fuel ethanol in China , 2008 .

[2]  M. Svanström,et al.  Sewage sludge handling with phosphorus utilization – life cycle assessment of four alternatives , 2008 .

[3]  J. Penman,et al.  Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories CH 4 Emissions from Solid Waste Disposal 419 CH 4 EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL , 2022 .

[4]  G. Destouni,et al.  Nutrient cycling and N2O emissions in a changing climate: the subsurface water system role , 2009 .

[5]  T. Buchholz,et al.  Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey , 2009 .

[6]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[7]  François Maréchal,et al.  Hydrothermal gasification of waste biomass: process design and life cycle asessment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Sven Bernesson,et al.  LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF RAPESEED OIL, RAPE METHYL ESTER AND ETHANOL AS FUELS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN LARGE- AND SMALL- SCALE PRODUCTION , 2004 .

[9]  Sune Balle Hansen,et al.  Feasibility Study of Performing an Life Cycle Assessment on Crude Palm Oil Production in Malaysia (9 pp) , 2007 .

[10]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from production and use of used cooking oil methyl ester as transport fuel in Thailand , 2009 .

[11]  M. Curran,et al.  A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective , 2007 .

[12]  Päivi Aakko,et al.  NExBTL - Biodiesel Fuel of the Second Generation , 2005 .

[13]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Energy and Greenhouse Gas Implications of Biodiesel Production from Jatropha curcas L. , 2006 .

[14]  M. Trabi,et al.  Exploitation of the tropical oil seed plant Jatropha curcas L. , 1999 .

[15]  K. Openshaw.  A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise☆ , 2000 .

[16]  Raphael Edinger,et al.  A concept for simultaneous wasteland reclamation, fuel production, and socio-economic development in degraded areas in India: need, potential and perspectives of Jatropha plantations. , 2005 .

[17]  F. Castells,et al.  Life cycle inventory analysis of hydrogen production by the steam-reforming process: comparison between vegetable oils and fossil fuels as feedstock , 2002 .

[18]  Y. Basiron.  Palm oil production through sustainable plantations , 2007 .

[19]  Juan Ignacio Montero,et al.  Land use indicators in life cycle assessment. Case study: The environmental impact of Mediterranean greenhouses , 2007 .

[20]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1997 .

[21]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  N 2 O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels , 2007 .