In vivo imaging of microfluidic-produced microbubbles

Microfluidics-based production of stable microbubbles for ultrasound contrast enhancement or drug/gene delivery allows for precise control over microbubble diameter but at the cost of a low production rate. In situ microfluidic production of microbubbles directly in the vasculature may eliminate the necessity for high microbubble production rates, long stability, or small diameters. Towards this goal, we investigated whether microfluidic-produced microbubbles directly administered into a mouse tail vein could provide sufficient ultrasound contrast. Microbubbles composed of nitrogen gas and stabilized with 3 % bovine serum albumin and 10 % dextrose were injected for 10 seconds into wild type C57BL/6 mice, via a tail-vein catheter. Short-axis images of the right and left ventricle were acquired at 12.5 MHz and image intensity over time was analyzed. Microbubbles were produced on the order of 105 microbubbles/s and were observed in both the right and left ventricles. The median rise time, duration, and decay time within the right ventricle were 2.9, 21.3, and 14.3 s, respectively. All mice survived the procedure with no observable respiratory or heart rate distress despite microbubble diameters as large as 19 μm.

[1]  E. Stride,et al.  Novel methods for preparing phospholipid coated microbubbles , 2008, European Biophysics Journal.

[2]  John C Chappell,et al.  Targeted delivery of nanoparticles bearing fibroblast growth factor-2 by ultrasonic microbubble destruction for therapeutic arteriogenesis. , 2008, Small.

[3]  John A Hossack,et al.  Focused Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery From Microbubbles Reduces Drug Dose Necessary for Therapeutic Effect on Neointima Formation—Brief Report , 2011, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[4]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Mechanism for flow-rate controlled breakup in confined geometries: a route to monodisperse emulsions. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[5]  A. Abate,et al.  From tubes to drops: droplet-based microfluidics for ultrahigh-throughput biology , 2013 .

[6]  M. Yamada,et al.  Hydrodynamic filtration for on-chip particle concentration and classification utilizing microfluidics. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[7]  J. Hossack,et al.  Production rate and diameter analysis of spherical monodisperse microbubbles from two-dimensional, expanding-nozzle flow-focusing microfluidic devices. , 2013, Biomicrofluidics.

[8]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction-scaling and mechanism of break-up. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[9]  R. Battino,et al.  Low-pressure solubility of gases in liquid water , 1977 .

[10]  John A Hossack,et al.  Enhanced intracellular delivery of a model drug using microbubbles produced by a microfluidic device. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Acoustic responses of monodisperse lipid-encapsulated microbubble contrast agents produced by flow focusing. , 2010, Bubble science engineering and technology.

[12]  Ethan Tumarkin,et al.  Microfluidic generation of microgels from synthetic and natural polymers. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[13]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  Microbubble-Size Dependence of Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Opening in Mice In Vivo , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[15]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Monodispersed microfluidic droplet generation by shear focusing microfluidic device , 2006 .

[16]  Robert J Eckersley,et al.  Evidence for spleen-specific uptake of a microbubble contrast agent: a quantitative study in healthy volunteers. , 2004, Radiology.

[17]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  Microbubble generation in a co-flow device operated in a new regime. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[18]  C. J. Oss,et al.  Determination of surface tensions of proteins. II. Surface tension of serum albumin, altered at the protein-air interface. , 1981, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  B D Butler,et al.  The lung as a filter for microbubbles. , 1979, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[20]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Basic Acoustic Properties of Microbubbles , 2002, Echocardiography.

[21]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[22]  E. Geiser,et al.  Inhaled gases affect the ultrasound contrast produced by Albunex in anesthetized dogs. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[23]  R. Bing,et al.  Microbubble dynamics visualized in the intact capillary circulation. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  A Bouakaz,et al.  Review of shell models for contrast agent microbubbles , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  The mechanism of interaction between focused ultrasound and microbubbles in blood-brain barrier opening in mice. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Wei-dong Yan,et al.  Interfacial Tension of (Methane + Nitrogen) + Water and (Carbon Dioxide + Nitrogen) + Water Systems , 2001 .

[27]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Long-term stability by lipid coating monodisperse microbubbles formed by a flow-focusing device. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[28]  E. G. Tickner,et al.  Why do the lungs clear ultrasonic contrast? , 1980, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  David M. Himmelblau,et al.  Diffusion coefficients of nitrogen and oxygen in water , 1967 .

[30]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[31]  Alfonso M Gañán-Calvo,et al.  Perfectly monodisperse microbubbling by capillary flow focusing: an alternate physical description and universal scaling. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  Lawrence A. Crum,et al.  Sonoluminescence and bubble dynamics for a single, stable, cavitation bubble , 1992 .

[33]  Francesco Conversano,et al.  In Vitro Evaluation and Theoretical Modeling of the Dissolution Behavior of a Microbubble Contrast Agent for Ultrasound Imaging , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[34]  David A. Weitz,et al.  A new device for the generation of microbubbles , 2004 .

[35]  A. Gañán-Calvo,et al.  Perfectly monodisperse microbubbling by capillary flow focusing. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[36]  R. D. Venter,et al.  THE STABILITY OF GAS BUBBLES IN LIQUID‐GAS SOLUTIONS * , 1983 .

[37]  T. Leighton 2 – Cavitation Inception and Fluid Dynamics , 1994 .

[38]  R. Powell,et al.  Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  David Needham,et al.  Test of the Epstein-Plesset model for gas microparticle dissolution in aqueous media: effect of surface tension and gas undersaturation in solution. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[40]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Flow-focusing regimes for accelerated production of monodisperse drug-loadable microbubbles toward clinical-scale applications. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[41]  K. Soetanto,et al.  Fundamental studies on contrast images from different-sized microbubbles: analytical and experimental studies. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[42]  A. Katiyar,et al.  Growth and dissolution of an encapsulated contrast microbubble: effects of encapsulation permeability. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[43]  L. Dalla Palma,et al.  Introduction to ultrasound contrast agents: physics overview , 1999, European Radiology.

[44]  A. Kabalnov,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 1. Theory. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[45]  Jameel A Feshitan,et al.  Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[46]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Development of the Field and Current Status , 2002 .

[47]  Shangfu Li,et al.  Controllable gas-liquid phase flow patterns and monodisperse microbubbles in a microfluidic T-junction device , 2006 .

[48]  J. Hossack,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of transiently stable albumin-coated microbubbles via a flow-focusing microfluidic device. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[49]  J. Gorce,et al.  Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Study of SonoVue™ , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[50]  Eleanor Stride,et al.  Novel preparation techniques for controlling microbubble uniformity: a comparison , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[51]  Successful Left Ventricular Opacification Following Peripheral Venous Injection of Sonicated Contrast Agent: An Experimental Evaluation , 1988 .

[52]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Formation of monodisperse bubbles in a microfluidic flow-focusing device , 2004 .

[53]  John A Hossack,et al.  Liquid flooded flow-focusing microfluidic device for in situ generation of monodisperse microbubbles , 2013, Microfluidics and nanofluidics.