Evolutionary Patterns and Development Prospects For e-Government: A Delphi-Based Approach to Perceptions of the Administrative Agent

Information technology is an open door for governments to service citizens in a more timely, cost-efficient and effective manner. Even considering citizen resistance, cultural adversity or changes in the economic agents' relationship, few would contest that concern over the state of electronic government (e-government) has increased over the years. This concern has been responsible for the emergence of a wide range of new initiatives devoted to development of the information and knowledge society, which occupies a central place in government policies and planning strategies worldwide. In this paper, we aim to analyze the evolutionary patterns of e-government in Portugal and, based on an application of the Delphi technique, provide development prospects considering the perceptions of a panel of administrative agents. Despite the low use of e-government services, our study demonstrates that the administrative agent expresses overall satisfaction with its use. Additionally, the high level of modernization allows us to forecast the increased use of information and communication technologies in terms of e-government services.

[1]  Andreas Ligtvoet,et al.  Citizens and e-Government: An International Comparison of the Demand-Side of e-Government , 2003, EGOV.

[2]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[4]  Pam J. Mayhew,et al.  Government-to-Citizens Relationship: Evaluating the Quality of Information on Saudi Ministries' Websites , 2007 .

[5]  Meghan E. Cook Making a Case for Local E-Government: The New York Experience , 2002, Digital Government Research.

[6]  Chia-Chien Hsu,et al.  The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus , 2007 .

[7]  G. Cardoso,et al.  A Sociedade em Rede. Do Conhecimento à Acção Política , 2006 .

[8]  Norman Crolee Dalkey,et al.  An experimental study of group opinion , 1969 .

[9]  Barbara Lörincz Digitizing public services in Europe: putting ambition into action , 2011 .

[10]  Arnoldina Pabedinskaitė,et al.  Application of forecasting methods in business , 2003 .

[11]  Tatjana Bileviciene,et al.  Problems of involvement of disabled persons in e. government , 2008 .

[12]  R. Čiegis,et al.  Participatory aspects of strategic sustainable development planning in local communities: Experience of Lithuania , 2008 .

[13]  Fernando Alberto Freitas Ferreira,et al.  A snapshot of the Portuguese e-banking activity: insights and a conceptual framework to allocate strategic hindrances , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[14]  David C. Yen,et al.  E-Government: Evolving relationship of citizens and government, domestic, and international development , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Aykut Arslan,et al.  Turkish Local E-Governments: A Longitudinal Study , 2006 .

[16]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Towards an agenda for e-government research and demographic change: a Delphi study approach , 2010, DG.O.

[17]  Andy Phippen Evaluating Citizen Attitudes Towards Local E-Government and a Comparison of Engagement Methods in the UK , 2007 .

[18]  Luis Borges Gouveia Local e-government - a governação digital na autarquia , 2004 .

[19]  Fernando Ferreira,et al.  Readjusting trade-offs among criteria in internal ratings of credit-scoring: an empirical essay of risk analysis in mortgage loans , 2013 .

[20]  Lucas M. Venter,et al.  A sustainable information security framework for e-Government – case of Tanzania , 2012 .

[21]  Adam Fadlalla,et al.  A context-based integrative framework for e-government initiatives , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Benchmarking e-Government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-Government index and ranking , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..