Roll motion is an undesirable feature of the behavior of a ship in rough seas, and so it is natural to consider ways of reducing it. The most common devices for increasing roll damping are bilge keels. However, the effectiveness of keels is limited, and anti-roll tanks and fins are used when more control is required. Moreover, unlike keels, anti-roll tanks can be used when the ship is not underway. Our objective is to develop design procedures for passive tanks for roll reduction in rough seas. To this end, we develop an improved model of the passive tank-liquid motion in this paper. This tank consists of U-shaped tubes placed side by side along the length of the ship. The equations of six-degrees-of-motion (6DOF) that govern the tank-liquid are coupled with those that govern the 6DOF motion of the ship, and all of the equations are integrated simultaneously in the time domain using the Large Amplitude Motion Program (“LAMP”). LAMP is a three-dimensional time-domain simulation of the motion of ships in waves. The unstabilized and stabilized roll motions of a S60-70 ship with forward speed and beam waves have been analyzed. For high-amplitude waves, the variation of the roll angle with the encounter-wave frequency exhibits typical nonlinear phenomena: a shift in the resonance frequency, multi-valued responses, and jumps. The performance of passive tanks on a S60-70 ship with forward speed is investigated in an irregular sea with different encounter-wave directions. It is found that passive anti-roll tanks tuned in the nonlinear range are very effective in reducing the roll motion. The effect of the tank mass and distribution of tank tubes on the performance of the tank system is studied. Also, it is found that passive anti-roll tanks are very effective in reducing the roll motion in sea state five of a ship whose pitch frequency is nearly twice its roll frequency.
[1]
Khaled S. Youssef,et al.
Design of passive anti-roll tanks for roll stabilization in the nonlinear range
,
2002
.
[2]
C. Stigter.
The performance of U-tanks as a passive anti-rolling device 1
,
1966
.
[3]
Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.
ON THE UNDESIRABLE ROLL CHARACTERISTICS OF SHIPS IN REGULAR SEAS
,
1988
.
[4]
S B Field,et al.
COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF U-TUBE AND FREE SURFACE TYPE PASSIVE ROLL STABILISATION SYSTEMS
,
1976
.
[5]
A. Nayfeh,et al.
NONLINEAR COUPLING OF PITCH AND ROLL MODES IN SHIP MOTIONS
,
1973
.
[6]
Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.
NONLINEAR ROLLING OF BIASED SHIPS IN REGULAR BEAM WAVES
,
1986
.
[7]
B S Lee,et al.
AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE STABILISATION EFFECTS OF ANTI-ROLL TANKS WITH FLOW OBSTRUCTIONS
,
1996
.
[8]
A. H. Nayfeh,et al.
Nonlinearly Coupled Pitch and Roll Motions in the Presence of Internal Resonance; Part I, Theory
,
1995
.
[9]
J F Dalzell,et al.
PREDICTION AND MEASUREMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF FREE-FLOODING SHIP ANTIROLLING TANKS
,
1988
.
[10]
Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.
Roll stabilization by anti-roll passive tanks
,
2001
.
[11]
Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.
NONLINEAR ROLLING OF SHIPS IN REGULAR BEAM SEAS
,
1986
.
[12]
A. Nayfeh,et al.
A theoretical and experimental investigation of indirectly excited roll motion in ships
,
2000,
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[13]
Prabhata K. Swamee,et al.
Explicit Equations for Pipe-Flow Problems
,
1976
.