A Computational Theory of Subjective Probability [Featuring a Proof that the Conjunction Effect is not a Fallacy]
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mark T. Keane,et al. Making sense of surprise: an investigation of the factors influencing surprise judgments. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[2] Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al. Simple algorithmic theory of subjective beauty, novelty, surprise, interestingness, attention, curiosity, creativity, art, science, music, jokes (特集 高次機能の学習と創発--脳・ロボット・人間研究における新たな展開) , 2009 .
[3] Jean-Louis Dessalles. A structural model of intuitive probability , 2011, ArXiv.
[4] J. Rissanen,et al. Modeling By Shortest Data Description* , 1978, Autom..
[5] Fintan Costello,et al. How probability theory explains the conjunction fallacy , 2009 .
[6] Ming Li,et al. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications , 2019, Texts in Computer Science.
[7] Ming Li,et al. Minimum description length induction, Bayesianism, and Kolmogorov complexity , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.
[8] A. Tversky,et al. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .
[9] Péter Gács,et al. Algorithmic statistics , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.