Sodium receiver designs for integration with high temperature power cycles

Abstract A variety of tube materials and geometries are considered in an analysis that identifies suitable sodium receiver designs for integration with next-generation thermodynamic power cycles. Sodium is capable of delivering outlet temperatures of > 750 ∘ C , however the net power output diminishes with rising temperatures due to tube material limitations on allowable flux density and increasing heat losses. Small tube diameters facilitate large thermal efficiencies and heat fluxes for all materials, however a large pressure drop penalty can somewhat mitigate these advantages. Traditional heat exchanger alloys perform quite poorly in comparison to Inconel 617 and Haynes 230, with allowable heat flux decreasing significantly as temperatures are increased beyond 600 ∘ C . Multi-pass concepts offer greater control of flow-path exposure to the heat flux boundary condition than straightforward single-pass designs. A triple-panel design with small diameter Inconel 617 tubes balances thermal, hydraulic, and mechanical performance most effectively across all temperatures. For all candidate materials, sodium can augment power plant efficiency when integrated with a high temperature cycle ( > 600 ∘ C ). A combined receiver and power cycle efficiency percentage point improvement of 1.5 % is possible using N i -based superalloys at ∼ 650 − 700 ∘ C compared to a baseline outlet temperature of 550 ∘ C , resulting in a solar-to-electric power output increase of over 4 % .

[1]  Ronan Grimes,et al.  Thermal and mechanical analysis of a sodium-cooled solar receiver operating under a novel heliostat aiming point strategy , 2018, Applied Energy.

[2]  Annemarie Grobler,et al.  Aiming strategies for small central receiver systems , 2015 .

[3]  T.-L. Sham,et al.  A Unified View of Engineering Creep Parameters , 2008 .

[4]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Visual HFLCAL - A Software Tool for Layout and Optimisation of Heliostat Fields , 2009 .

[5]  Ronan Grimes,et al.  Thermohydraulic analysis of single phase heat transfer fluids in CSP solar receivers , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[6]  Gregory J. Kolb,et al.  An evaluation of possible next-generation high temperature molten-salt power towers. , 2011 .

[7]  M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez,et al.  Aiming strategy model based on allowable flux densities for molten salt central receivers , 2017 .

[8]  Ranga Pitchumani,et al.  Thermal and structural investigation of tubular supercritical carbon dioxide power tower receivers , 2016 .

[9]  J. Coventry,et al.  A review of sodium receiver technologies for central receiver solar power plants , 2015 .

[10]  Brian D. Iverson,et al.  Review of high-temperature central receiver designs for concentrating solar power , 2014 .

[11]  C. Ho.  Advances in central receivers for concentrating solar applications , 2017 .

[12]  Richard Wright.  The Effect of Cold Work on Properties of Alloy 617 , 2014 .

[13]  M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez,et al.  Thermal design guidelines of solar power towers , 2014 .

[14]  Ricardo Vasquez Padilla,et al.  Ideal heat transfer conditions for tubular solar receivers with different design constraints , 2017 .

[15]  Clifford K. Ho,et al.  Concentrating Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap , 2017 .

[16]  K. Johannsen,et al.  Turbulent heat transfer in a circular tube with circumferentially varying thermal boundary conditions , 1974 .

[17]  Chao Xu,et al.  Study on the Allowable Flux Density for a Solar Central Dual-receiver☆ , 2015 .

[18]  W. Schiel,et al.  The IEA/SSPS high flux experiment , 1987 .

[19]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Optimization of Heliostat Aim Point Selection for Central Receiver Systems Based on the Ant Colony Optimization Metaheuristic , 2014 .

[20]  Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez,et al.  Solar flux distribution on central receivers: A projection method from analytic function , 2015 .

[21]  Xin Li,et al.  Allowable flux density on a solar central receiver , 2014 .

[22]  Ronan Grimes,et al.  Levelized cost of electricity evaluation of liquid sodium receiver designs through a thermal performance, mechanical reliability, and pressure drop analysis , 2018 .

[23]  Robert Flesch,et al.  Towards an optimal aiming for molten salt power towers , 2017 .

[24]  O. G. Martynenko,et al.  Handbook of hydraulic resistance , 1986 .

[25]  Brian D. Iverson,et al.  High-efficiency thermodynamic power cycles for concentrated solar power systems , 2014 .

[26]  John Pye,et al.  Thermoelastic stress in concentrating solar receiver tubes: A retrospect on stress analysis methodology, and comparison of salt and sodium , 2018 .

[27]  Robert A. Taylor,et al.  Liquid sodium versus Hitec as a heat transfer fluid in solar thermal central receiver systems , 2012 .

[28]  L. L. vant-Hull,et al.  The Role of “Allowable Flux Density” in the Design and Operation of Molten-Salt Solar Central Receivers , 2001 .

[29]  M. Geyer,et al.  Testing an external sodium receiver up to heat fluxes of 2.5 MW/m2: Results and conclusions from the IEA-SSPS high flux experiment conducted at the central receiver system of the Plataforma Solar de Almeria (Spain) , 1988 .

[30]  V. Sikka,et al.  Heat-to-heat variation in creep properties of Types 304 and 316 stainless steels , 1975 .

[31]  Robert A. Taylor,et al.  High temperature solar thermal central-receiver billboard design , 2013 .