Numerical assessment of the effect of equilibration time on coal permeability evolution characteristics

Abstract Although equilibration time has great significance in experiments of sorption-induced strain and coal permeability, most permeability models in which only one gas pressure has been taken into account cannot be used to calculate the permeability evolution during the adsorption phase, even though they have been successful in reservoir simulations. Here, a new mathematical model for coupled gas migration and coal deformation is developed to investigate the dynamics of CH4 adsorption in a coal sample when conducting a coal permeability experiment, and a novel permeability model based on the dual poroelastic theory is formulized to investigate the relationships between equilibration time and coal permeability evolution characteristics during the adsorption phase. A finite element model is applied to investigate the evolution characteristics of two gas pressures and permeability in a coal sample under laboratory conditions. Results illustrate that there is a large difference between the two gas pressures during the adsorption phase; before adsorption equilibrium is achieved, permeability, which is greater than that obtained when adsorption equilibrium is achieved, first increases and then decreases with increasing equilibration time.

[1]  R. A. Schraufnagel,et al.  Influence of Matrix Shrinkage and Compressibility on Gas Production From Coalbed Methane Reservoirs , 1990 .

[2]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Matrix shrinkage and swelling characteristics of European coals , 2009 .

[3]  Jerzy Ziętek,et al.  Binary gas sorption/desorption experiments on a bituminous coal: Simultaneous measurements on sorption kinetics, volumetric strain and acoustic emission , 2009 .

[4]  Zhongwei Chen,et al.  Effects of non-Darcy flow on the performance of coal seam gas wells , 2012 .

[5]  Robert A. Wattenbarger,et al.  Analysis and Verification of Dual Porosity and CBM Shape Factors , 2006 .

[6]  Robert M. Davidson,et al.  Coalbed methane extraction , 1995 .

[7]  W. Pabst,et al.  Elasticity of porous ceramics—A critical study of modulus−porosity relations , 2006 .

[8]  C. Spiers,et al.  Strain development in unconfined coals exposed to CO2, CH4 and Ar : Effect of moisture , 2009 .

[9]  Grant S. Bromhal,et al.  Influence of carbon dioxide on coal permeability determined by pressure transient methods , 2009 .

[10]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[11]  Eric P. Robertson,et al.  Modeling Permeability in Coal Using Sorption-Induced Strain Data , 2005 .

[12]  P. Ranjith,et al.  Investigation of the influence of coal swelling on permeability characteristics using natural brown coal and reconstituted brown coal specimens , 2012 .

[13]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production: Part 1 – Laboratory results , 2012 .

[14]  Hongxing Zhou,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Coupled Gas Flow and Coal Deformation with Gas Diffusion and Klinkenberg Effects , 2015, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[15]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery , 2004 .

[16]  Zuleima T. Karpyn,et al.  Development of a multi-mechanistic, dual-porosity, dual-permeability, numerical flow model for coalbed methane reservoirs , 2010 .

[17]  Somasundaram Valliappan,et al.  Numerical modelling of methane gas migration in dry coal seams , 1996 .

[18]  Roger Beckie,et al.  Flow of Coal-Bed Methane to a Gallery , 2000 .

[19]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Gas diffusion behavior of coal and its impact on production from coalbed methane reservoirs , 2011 .

[20]  H. Bruining,et al.  Swelling and sorption experiments on methane, nitrogen and carbon dioxide on dry Selar Cornish coal , 2010 .

[21]  Chen Mian,et al.  Effective stress laws for multi-porosity media , 1999 .

[22]  E. Robertson.  Measurement and Modeling of Sorption-Induced Strain and Permeability Changes in Coal , 2005 .

[23]  V. A. Kuuskraa,et al.  The Use of Simulation and History Matching To Determine Critical Coalbed Methane Reservoir Properties , 1987 .

[24]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2010 .

[25]  Jishan Liu,et al.  Impact of matrix swelling area propagation on the evolution of coal permeability under coupled multiple processes , 2014 .

[26]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: A new FE model , 2008 .

[27]  L. Connell,et al.  Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs: A review of analytical models and testing data , 2012 .

[28]  Kagan Tuncay,et al.  Effective stress principle for saturated fractured porous media , 1995 .

[29]  I. Gray,et al.  Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1-The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal Seams , 1987 .

[30]  John R. Seidle,et al.  Experimental Measurement of Coal Matrix Shrinkage Due to Gas Desorption and Implications for Cleat Permeability Increases , 1995 .

[31]  A. Cheng,et al.  Fundamentals of Poroelasticity , 1993 .

[32]  F. Gu,et al.  Analysis of Coalbed Methane Production by Reservoir and Geomechanical Coupling Simulation , 2005 .

[33]  Yuanping Cheng,et al.  A numerical model for outburst including the effect of adsorbed gas on coal deformation and mechanical properties , 2013 .

[34]  Dong Chen,et al.  Interactions of multiple processes during CBM extraction: A critical review , 2011 .

[35]  J. Geertsma,et al.  Problems of Rock Mechanics In Petroleum Production Engineering , 1966 .