Identifying invariant gait metrics for exoskeleton assistance

Exoskeletons have the potential to increase the independence and quality of life of patients with walking pathologies. To do this effectively, the exoskeleton requires a control paradigm that can determine the timing and magnitude of assistance that is suitable for the user's task and environment. This paper searches for a metric that can be optimised, enabling assistance to be applied without compromising the energy efficiency and stability of gait. Spatial and temporal, kinematic, kinetic, and other novel dynamic stability metrics were compared across three different assistance scenarios and five different walking contexts. Results demonstrated that three metrics: step width, medial-lateral centre of pressure displacement, and medial-lateral margin of stability were the most invariant. This result suggests dynamic stability metrics are optimised in human gait and therefore are potentially suitable metrics for optimising in an exoskeleton control paradigm.

[1]  D. Winter.  Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: Variability and compensating effects , 1984 .

[2]  F. Zajac,et al.  A planar model of the knee joint to characterize the knee extensor mechanism. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  M. Pandy,et al.  A Dynamic Optimization Solution for Vertical Jumping in Three Dimensions. , 1999, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[5]  M. Pandy,et al.  Dynamic optimization of human walking. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  B. Stansfield,et al.  Sagittal Joint Kinematics, Moments, and Powers Are Predominantly Characterized by Speed of Progression, Not Age, in Normal Children , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[7]  H. Herr,et al.  Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  M. Orendurff,et al.  The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Froude and the contribution of naval architecture to our understanding of bipedal locomotion. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[10]  A L Hof,et al.  The condition for dynamic stability. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Andrea N. Lay,et al.  The effects of sloped surfaces on locomotion: a kinematic and kinetic analysis. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Robotic lower limb exoskeletons using proportional myoelectric control , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Robert Riener,et al.  Locomotor training in subjects with sensori-motor deficits: An overview of the robotic gait orthosis lokomat , 2010 .

[16]  J Maxwell Donelan,et al.  Dynamic Principles of Gait and Their Clinical Implications , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[17]  Daniel P. Ferris,et al.  Invariant hip moment pattern while walking with a robotic hip exoskeleton. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Nicola Vitiello,et al.  Oscillator-based assistance of cyclical movements: model-based and model-free approaches , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[19]  R. Kram,et al.  The effects of grade and speed on leg muscle activations during walking. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[20]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  Reducing muscle effort in walking through powered exoskeletons , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[21]  Johanne Mattie,et al.  A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[22]  Mario Cortese,et al.  The effects on biomechanics of walking and balance recovery in a novel pelvis exoskeleton during zero-torque control , 2014, Robotica.

[23]  Andrea Parri,et al.  A light-weight active orthosis for hip movement assistance , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[24]  Massimo Sartori,et al.  MOtoNMS: A MATLAB toolbox to process motion data for neuromusculoskeletal modeling and simulation , 2015, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[25]  Andrea Parri,et al.  Physical human-robot interaction of an active pelvis orthosis: toward ergonomic assessment of wearable robots , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.