In-Vehicle Touchscreen Interaction: Can a Head-Down Display Give a Heads-Up on Obstacles on the Road?

Even though they are a known source of distraction, touchscreens have become increasingly commonplace in in-vehicle infotainment systems (IVIS). We explore a novel approach to possibly make the use of in-vehicle touchscreens safer, by displaying the road ahead directly above a touchscreen-based IVIS. This may allow the driver to keep the road in his field of vision through the head-down display (HDD) during IVIS interaction. A within-group study was conducted with 24 participants in a simulated automotive environment, comparing a configuration with and without livestream HDD. Reaction rates and times to obstacles were measured and subjective ratings recorded with the NASA TLX and a qualitative questionnaire. While qualitative measurements indicate that the concept may hold the potential to improve the driver's interaction with an IVIS, differences in quantitative metrics were not statistically significant. We reflect possible reasons for this based on an analysis of participants' behaviour and our qualitative results.

[1]  John D. Lee,et al.  Driver Distraction : Theory, Effects, and Mitigation , 2008 .

[2]  Tuomo Kujala Browsing the information highway while driving: three in-vehicle touch screen scrolling methods and driver distraction , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Using a Parking Assist System Over Time: Insights on Acceptance and Experiences , 2014, AutomotiveUI.

[4]  Andreas Butz,et al.  What you see is what you touch: visualizing touch screen interaction in the head-up display , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[5]  Glyn Lawson,et al.  Designing touchpad user-interfaces for vehicles: which tasks are most suitable? , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[6]  O. Renaud,et al.  A tutorial for analyzing human reaction times: How to filter data, manage missing values, and choose a statistical model , 2011, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[7]  Paul Green VISUAL AND TASK DEMANDS OF DRIVER INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[8]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems , 2011, Ergonomics.

[9]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Brake reaction times and driver behavior analysis , 2000 .

[10]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  A leap for touch: proximity sensitive touch targets in cars , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[11]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  A multi-touch enabled steering wheel: exploring the design space , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Paul Green,et al.  THE 15-SECOND RULE FOR DRIVER INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[13]  Lee Skrypchuk,et al.  Comparing the User Experience of Touchscreen Technologies in an Automotive Application , 2014, AutomotiveUI.

[14]  Omer Tsimhoni,et al.  Visual Demand of Driving and the Execution of Display-Intensive in-Vehicle Tasks , 2001 .

[15]  Valerie J. Gawron,et al.  Human performance measures handbook , 2000 .

[16]  J. D. Mollon,et al.  Vision out of the corner of the eye , 2011, Vision Research.