IT Capability Configurations for Innovation: An Empirical Study of Industrial SMEs

With the advent of globalization and the knowledge-based economy, industrial SMEs must constantly innovate to remain competitive. Now, an important research issue in this regard concerns the role played by IT capabilities in enabling innovation processes such as new product development, and in determining the product innovation performance of these organizations. Using a configurational approach grounded in the resource-based view, contingency theory, and the notions of "fit" and equifinality, we argue that IT capabilities can be leveraged for innovation purposes to the extent that they are co aligned and thus constitute IT capability configurations. This paper presents the results of a survey of 588 Canadian industrial SMEs designed to further analyze this issue.

[1]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Charlie Karlsson,et al.  Product Innovation in Small and Large Enterprises , 1998 .

[5]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Innovation and Industry Evolution , 1985 .

[6]  Danny Miller,et al.  Strategy from the inside Out: Building Capability-Creating Organizations , 2002 .

[7]  Shu Han,et al.  Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge Capabilities , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Philip Powell,et al.  Exploring SME Internet Adoption: Towards a Contingent Model , 2003, Electron. Mark..

[9]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Lessons from Innovation Empirical Studies in the Manufacturing Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 1993-2003 , 2006 .

[10]  George Westerman,et al.  Building IT-Enabled Innovation Capabilities at Intel , 2008, MIS Q. Executive.

[11]  Terri Scott,et al.  A consideration of the roles of business intelligence and e-business in management and marketing decision making in knowledge-based and high-tech start-ups , 2004 .

[12]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[13]  Mark Keil,et al.  Assimilation patterns in the use of electronic procurement innovations: A cluster analysis , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[14]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[15]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE , 1996 .

[16]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[17]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Strategic Decision Comprehensiveness and New Product Development Outcomes in New Technology Ventures , 2004 .

[18]  G. Sánchez-Marín,et al.  Strategic Orientation, Management Characteristics, and Performance: A Study of Spanish SMEs , 2005 .

[19]  Luc Cassivi,et al.  The Impact of E‐collaboration Tools on Firms' Performance , 2004 .

[20]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  e-Commerce Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations: Assessing the Value of e-Commerce to Firm Performance in the Manufacturing Sector , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  Value Appropriation as an Organizational Capability: The Case of Ip Protection Through Patents , 2009 .

[22]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[23]  William R. King,et al.  IT STRATEGY AND INNOVATION: Recent Innovations in Knowledge Management , 2006, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[24]  Sascha Kraus,et al.  The suitability of the configuration approach in entrepreneurship research , 2009 .

[25]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[26]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[27]  D. Third.  OECD/Eurostat . Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Paris, France: , 2005 .

[28]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[29]  P. Swamidass,et al.  Strategy, advanced manufacturing technology and performance: empirical evidence from U.S. manufacturing firms , 2000 .

[30]  Mile Terziovski,et al.  Building innovation capability in organizations: an international cross-case perspective , 2007 .

[31]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[33]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Impact of an ERP system’s capabilities upon the realisation of its business value: a resource-based perspective , 2012, Information Technology and Management.

[34]  L. Raymond,et al.  R&D as a determinant of innovation in manufacturing SMEs: An attempt at empirical clarification , 2010 .

[35]  Tian Zhang,et al.  BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases , 1996, SIGMOD '96.

[36]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation , 2010 .

[37]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[38]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[39]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[40]  John G. Watson,et al.  Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance , 2007 .

[41]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Manufacturing Strategy and Business Strategy in Medium-Sized Enterprises: Performance Effects of Strategic Alignment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[42]  Danny Miller,et al.  Notes on the Study of Configurations , 1999 .

[43]  Eric Overby,et al.  Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[45]  S. Thornhill.  Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes , 2006 .

[46]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[47]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Shu Lin,et al.  Plant Information Systems, Manufacturing Capabilities, and Plant Performance , 2006, MIS Q..

[49]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[50]  Ann P. Bartel,et al.  How Does Information Technology Affect Productivity? Plant-Level Comparisons of Product Innovation, Process Improvement, and Worker Skills , 2007 .

[51]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Taking Industry Seriously in Information Systems Research , 2005, MIS Q..

[52]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Peer C. Fiss.  A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[54]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[55]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  Varun Grover,et al.  Building and leveraging information in dynamic environments: The role of IT infrastructure flexibility as enabler of organizational responsiveness and competitive advantage , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[57]  Christopher G. Gresov.  Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. , 1989 .