Towards an Ontology-Based Approach to Knowledge Management of Graduate Attributes in Higher Education

Knowledge around graduate attributes (GAs) is an area in need of knowledge management strategies. GAs are the qualities and skills that a university agrees its students should develop during their time with the institution. The importance of GAs and ensuring they are embedded and assessed is widely accepted across higher education. This research paper uses Grounded Theory and Network Maps to gain insights into the issues of similarities and differences in the discourse around our sample universities. To cover these two perspectives, we had two researchers involved in data analysis, one with the goal of distilling key ideas and identifying similarities and the other with the goal of untangling and drawing out differences. There is no unified taxonomy of managing GAs. The motivation to create such ontology is to push the standardization process that will enable the connection among academic systems and improve educational workflows, communication, and collaboration between universities.

[1]  S. Barrie A research‐based approach to generic graduate attributes policy , 2004 .

[2]  Lesley Treleaven,et al.  Integrating the Development of Graduate Attributes Through Constructive Alignment , 2008 .

[3]  George Allan,et al.  A critique of using grounded theory as a research method , 2003 .

[4]  Precision Consultancy Graduate employability skills , 2007 .

[5]  Joseph J. Branin Knowledge Management in Academic Libraries , 2003 .

[6]  S. Barrie,et al.  A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes , 2007 .

[7]  Dev Raj Adhikari,et al.  Knowledge management in academic institutions , 2010 .

[8]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[9]  D. Thompson,et al.  Integrating Graduate Attributes with Assessment Criteria in Business Education: Using an Online Assessment System , 2008, Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice.

[10]  David D. Curtis,et al.  Employability skills for Australian industry : literature review and framework development , 2001 .

[11]  Natalya Keberle,et al.  UNIT-NET IEDI: An Infrastructure for Electronic Data Interchange. , 2008 .

[12]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[13]  Daniel E. O'Leary,et al.  Using AI in Knowledge Management: Knowledge Bases and Ontologies , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[14]  Carol Bond,et al.  Undergraduates' experiences of critical thinking , 2004 .

[15]  M. Tsui,et al.  Applying the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) Taxonomy on Student's Learning Outcomes: An empirical study , 2002 .

[16]  Olga Cherednichenko,et al.  Towards Information Management System for Licensing in Higher Education: An Ontology-Based Approach , 2007, ISTA.

[17]  Amy Scott Metcalfe,et al.  Knowledge Management and Higher Education: A Critical Analysis. , 2006 .

[18]  Marie Duzí,et al.  Concepts and Ontologies , 2009, EJC.

[19]  Anna Reid,et al.  University Lecturers’ Understanding of Sustainability , 2006 .

[20]  John Milam,et al.  Ontologies in Higher Education , 2006 .

[21]  Wendy Green,et al.  Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes? , 2009 .

[22]  Jolita Vveinhardt,et al.  The Paradigm of Knowledge Management in Higher Educational Institutions , 2009 .

[23]  Lisa Petrides,et al.  Knowledge Management for School Leaders: An Ecological Framework for Thinking Schools , 2002, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[24]  Ian Drummond,et al.  Personal transferable skills in higher education: the problems of implementing good practice , 1998 .

[25]  Anna Reid,et al.  Developing Generic Skills in Accounting: Resourcing and Reflecting on Trans-disciplinary Research and Insights , 2005 .