Tracking managed care: the importance of a cash incentive for medical director response to a survey.

OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of a monetary incentive in a survey mailed to medical directors of large medical groups and independent practice associations (IPAs). STUDY DESIGN Mailed survey. METHODS We mailed a survey to the medical directors of all medical groups and IPAs contracted with Blue Cross California Care, a large California managed care health plan (n = 174). After 2 mailings without any monetary incentive, we included a $50 bill in the third mailing to increase the response rate. RESULTS Only 46 medical directors responded to the first and second mailings (response rates of 17% and 13%, respectively). The third mailing, which included a $50 bill attached to the front of the survey, yielded 78 responses (66%), for an overall total of 124 (76%). We found no significant differences in the physician organizations of medical directors who responded to the mailing with the $50 incentive compared with the physician organizations of those who responded to 1 of the first 2 mailings, although medical directors who responded without the financial incentive were more likely to report that their organization had staff for quality assurance (96% vs 82%; P < or = .03). CONCLUSION Including a $50 bill improved the rate of response to a survey mailed to medical directors from 13%-17% to 66%.

[1]  C. Grady,et al.  What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Robinson Consolidation of medical groups into physician practice management organizations. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  A. Deehan,et al.  The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[5]  P. Kletke,et al.  Current trends in physicians' practice arrangements. From owners to employees. , 1996, JAMA.

[6]  R. Hays,et al.  Managed Care and Capitation in California: How Do Physicians at Financial Risk Control Their Own Utilization? , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  N. Holtzman,et al.  Improving response rates through incentive and follow-up: the effect on a survey of physicians' knowledge of genetics. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[8]  A. H. Church ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[9]  M. Klebanoff,et al.  The effect of two mailing strategies on the response to a survey of physicians. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  J. Lambert,et al.  Increasing response rates in physicians' mail surveys: an experimental study. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[11]  D. Kanouse,et al.  Physician Response to a Mailed Survey: An Experiment in Timing of Payment , 1987 .

[12]  R. Hays,et al.  Quality Assurance in Capitated Physician Groups , 1996 .

[13]  Unland Jj The evolution of physician-directed managed care. , 1995 .