An exploratory analysis of alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, and prostate-specific antigen dynamics in the phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial with radium-223

Background Baseline clinical variables are prognostic for overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Their prognostic and predictive value with agents targeting bone metastases, such as radium-223, is not established. Patients and methods The radium-223 ALSYMPCA trial enrolled patients with CRPC and symptomatic bone metastases. Prognostic potential of baseline variables was assessed using Cox models. Percentage changes in biomarker levels from baseline were evaluated during the trial period; changes from baseline to week 12 were evaluated for association with OS and surrogacy. Results Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, total alkaline phosphatase (tALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at baseline were associated with OS (P ≤ 0.0003) in the intent-to-treat population (radium-223, N = 614; placebo, N = 307). tALP declined from baseline within 4 weeks after beginning radium-223, by week 12 declining in 87% of radium-223 and 23% of placebo patients (P Conclusions Significant tALP declines (versus placebo) occurred as early as 4 weeks after beginning radium-223 therapy. tALP or LDH declines at 12 weeks correlated with longer OS, but did not meet statistical surrogacy requirements. Dynamic changes in tALP and LDH during radium-223 treatments may be useful to monitor, but do not serve as surrogates for survival.

[1]  Adam T Froemming,et al.  Prostate cancer post-treatment follow-up and recurrence evaluation , 2016, Abdominal Radiology.

[2]  P. Kantoff,et al.  A prognostic index model for predicting overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone acetate after docetaxel , 2015, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  M. Carducci,et al.  Bone-related Parameters are the Main Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival in Men with Bone Metastases from Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[4]  Tomasz Burzykowski,et al.  Circulating tumor cell biomarker panel as an individual-level surrogate for survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  R. Vessella,et al.  Radium-223 dichloride exhibits dual mode-of-action inhibiting both tumour and tumour-induced bone growth in two osteoblastic prostate cancer models , 2015 .

[6]  R. Fitzgerald,et al.  Revision of the NIST Standard for 223Ra: New Measurements and Review of 2008 Data , 2015, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[7]  S. Fosså,et al.  Effect of radium-223 dichloride on symptomatic skeletal events in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases: results from a phase 3, double-blind, randomised trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  M. Morris,et al.  Updated prognostic model for predicting overall survival in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  A. Armstrong,et al.  Prognostic model predicting metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer survival in men treated with second-line chemotherapy. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  I Syndikus,et al.  Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E. Alhoniemi,et al.  Survival benefit with radium-223 dichloride in a mouse model of breast cancer bone metastasis. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  C. Parker,et al.  A randomized, double-blind, dose-finding, multicenter, phase 2 study of radium chloride (Ra 223) in patients with bone metastases and castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2013, European urology.

[13]  T. Ichikawa,et al.  Clinical usefulness of bone markers in prostate cancer with bone metastasis , 2012, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[14]  I. Tannock,et al.  Serum alkaline phosphatase changes predict survival independent of PSA changes in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastasis receiving chemotherapy. , 2012, Urologic oncology.

[15]  I. Tannock,et al.  A Contemporary Prognostic Nomogram for Men with Hormone-Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A TAX327 Study Analysis , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  F. Saad,et al.  Markers of Bone Metabolism and Survival in Men with Hormone-Refractory Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[17]  C. Tangen,et al.  Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen declines for surrogacy in patients treated on SWOG 99-16. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  P. Kantoff,et al.  Prognostic model for predicting survival in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Kevin Regan,et al.  Nomogram for overall survival of patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer after castration. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  P. Flandre,et al.  Estimating the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker by D. Y. Lin, T. R. Fleming and V. De Gruttola, Statistics in Medicine, 16, 1515–1527 (1997) , 1999 .

[21]  S M Larson,et al.  A new parameter for measuring metastatic bone involvement by prostate cancer: the Bone Scan Index. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[22]  R. Prentice Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.