Diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions by epiluminescence microscopy: determinants of accuracy improvement in a nationwide training programme for practical dermatologists.

BACKGROUND: The poor accuracy of the clinical examination of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs) is a major limitation of secondary prevention strategies for cutaneous melanoma (CMM). In the last few years, the epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) technique has been used increasingly as an adjunct to clinical examination in the dermatology practice. Although the question of training has emerged as a priority, the diffusion, the effects, and the correlates of educational programmes in ELM have seldom been studied. METHODS: Thirty ELM images of PSLs (11 CMMs, 14 melanocytic nevi (MN), and 5 nonmelanocytic lesions (NMLs) each matched with the corresponding clinical or plain photographic image were independently diagnosed before and after a one-day workshop by 83 Italian dermatologists participating in a nationwide educational programme on ELM. The original histology diagnosis was assumed as a gold standard. The overall effect of training on a set of accuracy measures by PSL type was evaluated. The association of the professional sector (public/private), number of years of general experience in dermatology (1-10/>10), average weekly number of PSLs seen ( 20), routine use of ELM (no/yes), and area of residence (northern/southern Italy) with the mean number of PSLs correctly diagnosed before and after training was evaluated with the general factorial analysis of variance. The factors associated with improvement between the two tests were evaluated with the analysis of variance for repeated measures. RESULTS: Compared with pretraining data, the average percentage of exact diagnosis increased significantly for all PSLs (CMMs, 72% vs 55%; MN, 68% vs 64%; NMLs, 67% vs 58%; total lesions combined, 69% vs 60%). Baseline as well as final accuracy were independent from the professional sector and the years of experience but were greater among those subjects who reported >20 PSLs per week compared with the reference group (< or =10 PSLs). The routine use of ELM was associated with a slight advantage in pretraining accuracy. The area of residence was the strongest determinant of baseline as well as final accuracy. The effect of training was independent from all factors studied with the exception of the area of residence with a 13% increase in the frequency of exact diagnosis in northern Italy (from 66-79%) and 6% in southern Italy (from 55-61%). CONCLUSIONS: Though insufficient in absolute terms, a measurable increase in ELM accuracy can be achieved even with intense training sessions of short duration. Medical education to ELM in southern Italy should be a priority.

[1]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy: Criteria of cutaneous melanoma progression , 1997 .

[2]  I. Stanganelli,et al.  Accuracy of Epiluminescence Microscopy among Practical Dermatologists: A Study from the Emilia-Romagna Region of Italy , 1998, Tumori.

[3]  G Pellacani,et al.  Digital videomicroscopy improves diagnostic accuracy for melanoma. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[4]  M. Binder,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy. A useful tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions for formally trained dermatologists. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[5]  I. Harvey,et al.  The prevention of skin cancer: is there a gap between evidence and practice? , 1996, Public health.

[6]  R. MacKie,et al.  Audit of public education campaign to encourage earlier detection of malignant melanoma. , 1992, BMJ.

[7]  C. Del Mar,et al.  Melanocytic lesions excised from the skin: what percentage are malignant? , 2010, Australian journal of public health.

[8]  H Kerl,et al.  Surface Microscopy: A New Approach to the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Pigmented Tumors , 1989, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[9]  H. Soyer,et al.  Microscopie de surface des tumeurs cutanées pigmentées , 1993 .

[10]  H. Kerl,et al.  [Surface microscopy of pigmented cutaneous tumors]. , 1993, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.

[11]  Instrumentation for epiluminescence microscopy: the gap between research and practice. , 1996, Archives of dermatology.

[12]  S. Menzies,et al.  A sensitivity and specificity analysis of the surface microscopy features of invasive melanoma , 1996, Melanoma research.

[13]  K Wolff,et al.  Statistical evaluation of epiluminescence microscopy criteria for melanocytic pigmented skin lesions. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[14]  R. Kenet,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of pigmented lesions using digital epiluminescence microscopy. Grading protocol and atlas. , 1993, Archives of dermatology.

[15]  S Seidenari,et al.  Computerized evaluation of pigmented skin lesion images recorded by a videomicroscope: comparison between polarizing mode observation and oil/slide mode observation , 1995, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[16]  A. Kopf,et al.  Histopathologic Correlates of Structures Seen on Dermoscopy (Epiluminescence Microscopy) , 1993, The American Journal of dermatopathology.

[17]  K Wolff,et al.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. I. Pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions. , 1987, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[18]  K Wolff,et al.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[19]  A. Ackerman,et al.  How accurate are dermatologists in the diagnosis of melanoma? Degree of accuracy and implications. , 1992, Archives of dermatology.

[20]  D. Rigel Epiluminescence microscopy in clinical diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions? , 1997, The Lancet.

[21]  K Wolff,et al.  Epiluminescence microscopy of small pigmented skin lesions: short-term formal training improves the diagnostic performance of dermatologists. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[22]  I. Stanganelli,et al.  Critical effects of intense sun exposure on the expression of epiluminescence microscopy features of acquired melanocytic nevi. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[23]  J Smolle,et al.  Terminology in surface microscopy. Consensus meeting of the Committee on Analytical Morphology of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Forschung, Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany, Nov. 17, 1989. , 1990, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[24]  J. Mayer,et al.  Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy in detecting malignant melanoma , 1997, The Medical journal of Australia.

[25]  I. Stanganelli,et al.  Intraobserver agreement in interpretation of digital epiluminescence microscopy. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[26]  I. Stanganelli,et al.  Epiluminescence Microscopy versus Clinical Evaluation of Pigmented Skin Lesions: Effects of Operator’s Training on Reproducibility and Accuracy , 1998, Dermatology.

[27]  Josef Smolle,et al.  Diagnostic reliability of dermoscopic criteria for detecting malignant melanoma. , 1995 .

[28]  H Kerl,et al.  Sensitivity in the clinical diagnosis of malignant melanoma , 1994, Melanoma research.

[29]  K Wolff,et al.  In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions. II. Diagnosis of small pigmented skin lesions and early detection of malignant melanoma. , 1987, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.