This paper presents an overview of the SemanticWeb 2.0 application CultureSampo, an ambitious system for creating a collective semantic memory of the cultural heritage of a nation on the Semantic Web 2.0, combining ideas underlying the Semantic Web and the Web 2.0. The system addresses the semantic web challenge of aggregating highly heterogeneous, cross-domain cultural heritage content into a semantically rich intelligent system for human and machine users. At the same time, CultureSampo is an approach to solve the social and practical Web 2.0 challenge of organizing the underlying collaborative ontology development and content creation work of memory organizations and citizens. I. Components of a National Semantic Memory The research question of this paper is: How to publish cultural heritage collections on the web involving virtually all kind of cross-domain contents of memory organizations and citizens? The targeted system should have the following properties: • From the publishers’ viewpoint, it is possible to publish content easily by providing semantic metadata locally. Expensive manual work on the global portal side is minimized. • The contents are automatically linked with other publishers’ contents and get semantically enriched from each other. • Researchers and citizens can contribute to the contents of the system with their own contents and knowledge. • From the end users’ viewpoint, contents can be accessed easily from different user-centric thematic perspectives and contexts. • Intelligent search and browsing services of the application can find answers to questions in addition to data records. • The aggregated contents and services of the system can be reused in external web applications easily as mash-ups. • Multilinguality is supported; language barriers can be overcome. Fulfilling these desires is challenging due to two major reasons: • Semantic challenges. Cultural heritage content is semantically heterogeneous and available in various forms (documents, images, audio tracks, videos, collection items, learning objects etc.), concern various topics (art, history, handicraft etc.), is written in different languages, and is targeted to both nonprofessionals and experts. Furthermore, the content is mutually interlinked, as depicted in figure 1.1. For example, the (meta)data may contain a person’s narrative biography, works of art she created, places of interest where she lived in, Wikipedia articles or novels about or by the person, social connections to other persons, and events in the history that the person was related to. • Organizational challenges. Various mutually independent museums, archives, libraries, media organizations, associations, and individual citizens create cultural heritage content. This kind of distributed content creation model has lead to a situation, where even simple metadata about a single homogenous content type, such as museum artifacts, can be highly incompatible in different institutions [19]. Figure 1.1 Cultural heritage is semantically heterogeneous and mutually linked. This paper presents an overview of CultureSampo [1, 22] addressing these challenges on a national Finnish level, based on semantic web technologies [34] and Web 2.0. The system has been developed since 2004, starting from the portal “MuseumFinland—Finnish Museums on the Semantic Web” [19], as a part the FinnONTO project for building a national level Encyclopedia Artifacts Maps
[1]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
CultureSampo-Finnish Culture on the Semantic Web: The Vision and First Results
,
2007
.
[2]
Véronique Malaisé,et al.
A Method to Convert Thesauri to SKOS
,
2006,
ESWC.
[3]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Distributed Semantic Content Creation and Publication for Cultural Heritage Legacy Systems
,
2008
.
[4]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
MuseumFinland - Finnish museums on the semantic web
,
2005,
J. Web Semant..
[5]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Efficient Content Creation on the Semantic Web Using Metadata Schemas with Domain Ontology Services (System Description)
,
2007,
ESWC.
[6]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Relational Semantic Search : Searching Social Paths on the Semantic Web
,
2007
.
[7]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Building a National Semantic Web Ontology and Ontology Service Infrastructure -The FinnONTO Approach
,
2008,
ESWC.
[8]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Enabling the Semantic Web with Ready-to-Use Web Widgets
,
2007,
FIRST.
[9]
Zhisheng Huang,et al.
MultimediaN E-Culture Demonstrator
,
2006,
International Semantic Web Conference.
[10]
Nicola Guarino,et al.
Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE
,
2002,
EKAW.
[11]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Semantic Kalevala - Accessing Cultural Contents Through Semantically Annotated Stories
,
2007
.
[12]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
An Event-Based Approach for Semantic Metadata Interoperability
,
2007,
ISWC/ASWC.
[13]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Semantic Portals for Cultural Heritage
,
2009,
Handbook on Ontologies.
[14]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Semantic Autocompletion
,
2006,
ASWC.
[15]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Describing and Linking Cultural Semantic Content by Using Situations and Actions
,
2006
.
[16]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Using an Ontology of Historical Events in Semantic Portals for Cultural Heritage
,
2007
.
[17]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
A Method for Determining Ontology-Based Semantic Relevance
,
2007,
DEXA.
[18]
Amit P. Sheth,et al.
Semantic Association Identification and Knowledge Discovery for National Security Applications
,
2005,
J. Database Manag..
[19]
Lora Aroyo,et al.
Semantics : Science , Services and Agents on the World Wide Web
,
2008
.
[20]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Creating and Using Geospatial Ontology Time Series in a Semantic Cultural Heritage Portal
,
2008,
ESWC.
[21]
John F. Sowa,et al.
Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations
,
2000
.
[22]
Eero Hyvönen,et al.
Automatic Exhibition Generation Based on Semantic Cultural Content
,
2007
.