Research Outputs as Vehicles of Knowledge Exchange in a Quintuple Helix Context: The Case of Biofuels Research Outputs
暂无分享,去创建一个
Enas Alhassan | R. Sandra Schillo | Margaret A. Lemay | Fred Pries | R. Schillo | F. Pries | Enas Alhassan | R. S. Schillo
[1] Barry Bozeman,et al. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .
[2] Franco Malerba,et al. The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: The role of industrial users in semiconductors , 2013 .
[3] Ida Grundel,et al. A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy , 2016 .
[4] Diane A. Isabelle,et al. Linking advanced biofuels policies with stakeholder interests: A method building on Quality Function Deployment , 2017 .
[5] Andy Neely,et al. How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System , 2010 .
[6] Elias G. Carayannis,et al. 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..
[7] R. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .
[8] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..
[9] Christopher S. Hayter,et al. Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer , 2013 .
[10] Denny K. S. Ng,et al. Review of evolution, technology and sustainability assessments of biofuel production , 2014 .
[11] Ronald K. Mitchell,et al. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .
[12] H. Etzkowitz,et al. The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .
[13] Izak Benbasat,et al. Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..
[14] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Quality control and validation boundaries in a triple helix of university-industry-government: “Mode 2” and the future of university research , 2000, ArXiv.
[15] Alison Mohr,et al. Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels☆ , 2013, Energy Policy.
[16] Elias G. Carayannis,et al. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?: A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology , 2010 .
[17] E. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .
[18] Laurence Turcksin,et al. A multi-actor multi-criteria framework to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: The case of Belgium , 2011 .
[19] A. Wesselink,et al. Research impacts and impact on research in biodiversity conservation: The influence of stakeholder engagement , 2012 .
[20] Phillip H. Phan,et al. The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned, Managerial and Policy Implications, and the Road Forward , 2006 .
[21] Elias G. Carayannis,et al. Editorial preface to the first volume of Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 2012, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
[22] Creso M. Sá,et al. The use of academic research in public health policy and practice , 2014 .
[23] E. Carayannis,et al. Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development , 2011 .
[24] S. Schwartzman,et al. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .
[25] E. Carayannis,et al. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation , 2012 .
[26] Albert N. Link,et al. Introduction: Technology Transfer in the Global Economy , 2012 .
[27] Andrew J. Nelson. Putting University Research in Context: Assessing Alternative Measures of Production and Diffusion at Stanford , 2011 .
[28] A. Neely,et al. Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity , 2008 .
[29] Jacqueline E. W. Broerse,et al. Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: learning how and what? , 2011 .
[30] Marie C. Thursby,et al. Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .
[31] L. Leydesdorff,et al. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .
[32] Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga,et al. A sustainable framework for biofuels in Europe , 2013 .
[33] Henry Etzkowitz,et al. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies , 1998 .
[34] C. Kemfert,et al. An overview of biofuel policies across the world , 2010 .
[35] E. Ruto,et al. Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.
[36] A. Salter,et al. Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .
[37] Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al. Strategic sourcing in the UK bioenergy industry , 2013 .
[38] A. Link,et al. An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .
[39] J. Ziolkowska. Prospective technologies, feedstocks and market innovations for ethanol and biodiesel production in the US , 2014, Biotechnology reports.