Research Outputs as Vehicles of Knowledge Exchange in a Quintuple Helix Context: The Case of Biofuels Research Outputs

In this study, we draw on Triple/Quadruple/Quintuple Helix theory to analyze differences in perceptions of research outputs between researchers and users in the context of advanced biofuels research — a research environment heavily shaped by social and environmental forces. We present results based on qualitative empirical analysis, presenting the responses of both researchers and research users with regards to the uses of research outputs, users’ access to them, and the quality of research outputs. Results show that researchers have a nuanced conceptualization of characteristics that render research outputs useful to private sector users of research outputs, and they show considerable alignment in their assessment with private sector research users. Despite general awareness of policy uses of research, and despite the societal and environmental drivers for research and commercialization of advanced biofuels, these considerations were not as dominant in the assessment of research outputs. Our results imply that further work is needed to integrate the relatively recent concepts of Quadruple/Quintuple Helix and the underlying considerations of societal and environmental concerns into the practice of knowledge exchanges, and that additional theory and measurement development at the level of analysis of research results would be useful.

[1]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory , 2000 .

[2]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: The role of industrial users in semiconductors , 2013 .

[3]  Ida Grundel,et al.  A Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Approach to Regional Innovation Systems in the Transformation to a Forestry-Based Bioeconomy , 2016 .

[4]  Diane A. Isabelle,et al.  Linking advanced biofuels policies with stakeholder interests: A method building on Quality Function Deployment , 2017 .

[5]  Andy Neely,et al.  How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System , 2010 .

[6]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[7]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[8]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[9]  Christopher S. Hayter,et al.  Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer , 2013 .

[10]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  Review of evolution, technology and sustainability assessments of biofuel production , 2014 .

[11]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[12]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Quality control and validation boundaries in a triple helix of university-industry-government: “Mode 2” and the future of university research , 2000, ArXiv.

[15]  Alison Mohr,et al.  Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels☆ , 2013, Energy Policy.

[16]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other?: A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology , 2010 .

[17]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[18]  Laurence Turcksin,et al.  A multi-actor multi-criteria framework to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: The case of Belgium , 2011 .

[19]  A. Wesselink,et al.  Research impacts and impact on research in biodiversity conservation: The influence of stakeholder engagement , 2012 .

[20]  Phillip H. Phan,et al.  The Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer: Lessons Learned, Managerial and Policy Implications, and the Road Forward , 2006 .

[21]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Editorial preface to the first volume of Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship , 2012, Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[22]  Creso M. Sá,et al.  The use of academic research in public health policy and practice , 2014 .

[23]  E. Carayannis,et al.  Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development , 2011 .

[24]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[25]  E. Carayannis,et al.  The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation , 2012 .

[26]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Introduction: Technology Transfer in the Global Economy , 2012 .

[27]  Andrew J. Nelson Putting University Research in Context: Assessing Alternative Measures of Production and Diffusion at Stanford , 2011 .

[28]  A. Neely,et al.  Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity , 2008 .

[29]  Jacqueline E. W. Broerse,et al.  Stakeholder interaction within research consortia on emerging technologies: learning how and what? , 2011 .

[30]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[31]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[32]  Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  A sustainable framework for biofuels in Europe , 2013 .

[33]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies , 1998 .

[34]  C. Kemfert,et al.  An overview of biofuel policies across the world , 2010 .

[35]  E. Ruto,et al.  Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[37]  Prasanta Kumar Dey,et al.  Strategic sourcing in the UK bioenergy industry , 2013 .

[38]  A. Link,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .

[39]  J. Ziolkowska Prospective technologies, feedstocks and market innovations for ethanol and biodiesel production in the US , 2014, Biotechnology reports.