Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China

Abstract Technology innovation benign to environmental preservation is one of the key strategies to address sustainable development. Understanding the pattern of environmental technology innovation in a country is necessary for making policies and decisions in environment management. Temporal and spatial distribution of environmental patents was analyzed to identify innovation capability of environmental technologies in China. In terms of features the patents were classified into invention, utility model (performance improvement) and design. The patents belonged to the individuals, enterprises and research institutes in terms of ownership. Through analyzing the pattern of environmental patents by features and ownership, it was found that individual-owned patents and utility model patents accounted for the biggest percentage of all the environmental patents applied by the domestic applicants. Eastern provinces had the majority of environmental patents. The cluster analysis showed that invention patents and enterprise-owned patents were concentrated in the eastern provinces. In general, the innovation capability of environmental technologies in the east is strongest among the regions. Though it had been improved in the last two decades, the percentage of invention patents was still small and enterprises did not play the most important role in innovation. Applications of environmental patents increased gradually but had a declining share of all the patents in the last two decades. The innovation capability of environmental technologies in China is still not strong on a global perspective.

[1]  J. Schot,et al.  Environmental Strategies for Industry: International Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implications , 1993 .

[2]  Margaret R. Taylor,et al.  Control of SO2 emissions from power plants: A case of induced technological innovation in the U.S. , 2005 .

[3]  Yonglong Lu,et al.  A spatial temporal assessment of pollution from PCBs in China. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[4]  Richard Florida,et al.  Lean and Green: The Move to Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing , 1996 .

[5]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  It's easier to say green than be green , 1996 .

[6]  Brian Garrod,et al.  Environmental management and business strategy: Towards a new strategic paradigm , 1996 .

[7]  C. Fan,et al.  Of Belts and Ladders: State Policy and Uneven Regional Development in Post-Mao China , 1995 .

[8]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[9]  K. Green,et al.  Technological trajectories and R&D for environmental innovation in UK firms☆ , 1994 .

[10]  Ellen H.M. Moors,et al.  Technology strategies for sustainable metals production systems: a case study of primary aluminium production in The Netherlands and Norway , 2006 .

[11]  David Wheeler,et al.  Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where Are the Pollution Havens? , 1993 .

[12]  Jianfa Shen.  Urban and regional development in post-reform China: the case of Zhujiang delta , 2002 .

[13]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Regulation, Business, and Sustainable Development , 2000 .

[14]  M. Albert,et al.  Adoption of green chemistry: an analysis based on US patents , 2004 .

[15]  Corrado lo Storto,et al.  A method based on patent analysis for the investigation of technological innovation strategies: The European medical prostheses industry , 2006 .

[16]  P. Beneito.  The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models , 2006 .

[17]  G. Briefs.  Business cycles , 1949 .

[18]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[19]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technology Cycles, Innovation Streams and Ambidextrous Organizations , 1997 .

[20]  Jeong-Dong Lee,et al.  Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: Factors affecting success and failure in Korea , 2006 .

[21]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[22]  I. Vickers.  Cleaner Production and OrganizationalLearning , 1999 .

[23]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Understanding Technological Responses of Industrial Firms to Environmental Problems: Implications for Government Policy (chapter) , 1993 .

[24]  Qihao Weng.  Local Impacts of the Post‐Mao Development Strategy: The Case of the Zhujiang Delta, Southern China , 1998 .

[25]  Albert K. Tsui,et al.  Analysis of real GDP growth rates of greater China: An asymmetric conditional volatility approach , 2004 .

[26]  Alan Pilkington,et al.  The electric vehicle:: Patent data as indicators of technological development , 2002 .

[27]  David J. Livingstone,et al.  Data Analysis for Chemists: Applications to QSAR and Chemical Product Design , 1996 .